Table D.1
Detailed comparison of the membership catalogue with literature-based catalogues obtained from individual methods.
Method | Total no. of stars | HSC+UKIDSS counterpart | No. of stars rejected due to parallax | No. of stars used in RF | No. of stars recovered | No. of stars not recovered | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Gaia based literature sources | |||||||
Optical Spectroscopy | 301 | 206 | 54 | 152 | 132 (87%) | 20 | C02; S06b; S13b |
Spitzer MIR | 87 | 44 | 17 | 27 | 20 (74%) | 7 | R04; S06a; M09; R13 |
Hα emission | 621 | 421 | 201 | 220 | 196 (89%) | 24 | B11; N12 |
X-ray emission | 518 | 247 | 75 | 172 | 132 (77%) | 40 | G07; ME09; G12 |
NIR, MIR, and X-ray | 421 | 144 | 5 | 139 | 21 (15%) | 118 | S21 |
Optical/2MASS photometry, spectroscopy and variability | 263 | 184 | 44 | 140 | 113 (81%) | 27 | S05; S05; S10 |
NIR variability | 359 | 323 | 173 | 150 | 53 (35%) | 97 | M19 |
All the above | 2178 | 1224 | 514 | 710 | 403 (57%) | 307 | – |
Gaia-based literature sources | |||||||
Gaia-Dr2/EDR3/DR3 | 1468 | 1217 | – | 1217 | 1020 (84%) | 197 | C18; P23; D23 |
Notes. Column 1 specifies the method used to obtain candidate members. Columns 2 and 3 list the total number of stars and their HSC+UKIDSS counterparts, respectively. Column 4 provides the number of stars rejected based on the Gaia parallax condition, as explained in Section 5.1.1. Column 5 indicates the number of stars actually used in the RF analysis. Columns 6 and 7 show the number of stars recovered and not recovered by our current method, respectively. Column 8 lists the references for the individual methods.
References. C02-Contreras et al. (2002); S06b-Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2006b); S13b-Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2013); R04-Reach et al. (2004); S06a-Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2006a); M09-Morales-Calderón et al. (2009); R13-Rebull et al. (2013); B11-Barentsen et al. (2011); N12-Nakano et al. (2012); G07-Getman et al. (2007); ME09-Mercer et al. (2009); G12-Getman et al. (2012); S21-Silverberg et al. (2021); S04-Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2004); S05-Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2005); S10-Sicilia-Aguilar et al. (2010); M19-Meng et al. (2019); C18-Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018); P23-Pelayo-Baldárrago et al. (2023); D23-Das et al. (2023)
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.