Open Access

Table A.1

Disk parameters assumed in our modeling.

Name Adopted d (pc) i (°) PA (°) Rout (au) Te f f (K) L (L) R (R) M (M) M˙$\[\dot{M}\]$ (M/yr) References
AA Tau AA Tau 137 59.0 93.0 160 4350 1.10 1.85 0.68 10−7.4 (20, 21, 23)
AS209 AS209 121 35.0 85.7 150 4265 1.40 2.20 1.31 10−7.3 (1, 2, 34)
CI Tau CI Tau 160 49.2 11.3 300 4200 1.26 2.12 1.02 10−8.2 (3, 4, 5, 6)
DL Tau DL Tau 159 45.0 52.1 200 4277 0.64 1.47 0.98 10−7.2 (7, 23)
DoAr25 DoAr25 138 67.0 110.0 165 4266 0.95 1.79 1.06 10−8.3 (1, 2, 6)
DS Tau DS Tau 159 65.2 160.0 100 3792 0.25 1.15 0.58 10−7.3 (7, 23)
Elia 2-24 Elias24 136 29.0 45.7 160 4266 6.00 4.50 0.46 10−6.4 (1, 2)
GM Aur GM Aur 159 53.2 57.2 300 4350 0.90 1.67 1.32 10−8.0 (8, 9, 10, 23)
GO Tau GO Tau 144 54.0 21.0 150 3516 0.29 1.7* 0.36 (7, 11)
GW Lup GWLup 155 38.7 37.6 140 3630 0.33 4.0* 0.46 10−9.0 (1, 2)
FS Tau B Haro 6-5B 140 74.0 145.0 300 4265g 2.94g (12)
HD142666 HD142666 148 62.0 162.0 70 7586 9.12 1.74 1.73 < 10−8.4 (1, 2, 6)
HD163296 HD163296 101 46.7 133.0 169 9333 17.0 1.58 2.04 10−7.4 (1, 2)
HL Tau HL Tau 147 46.7 138.0 147 4000 40* 1.70 10−7.1 (24, 25, 26)
ISO-Oph 17 ISO-Oph 17 140 42.4 131.0 84 3989 3.98 4.20 0.69 10−7.6 (13, 14)
J16083070-3828268 J1608 156 73.0 108.0 121 4800 3.02 2.00 1.40 10−9.2 (15, 22, 23)
J16100501-2132318 J1610 145 37.8 60.5 100 3950 0.46 1.45 0.67 (16)
LkCa 15 LkCa 15 159 50.2 61.9 250 4500 1.05 1.69 1.25 10−9.2 (16, 17)
MY Lup MYLup 156 73.0 58.8 110 5129 0.87 1.18 1.23 < 10−9.6 (1, 2)
J16313124-2426281 Oph163131 147 84.0 49.0 170 4500 5.1* 1.20 (15, 18)
PDS70 PDS70 113 49.7 160.4 120 3972 0.35 1.26 0.76 10−10.2 (27, 28)
RY Tau RY Tau 138 65.0 23.0 100 5945 11.8 3.25 1.95 10−7.7 (29, 30)
V1094Sco V1094Sco 150 55.0 109.0 300 4205 1.15 2.02 0.83 10−7.9 (19, 14, 23)

Disks without constraints on their vertical thickness
DoAr33 DoAr33 139 41.8 81.1 27 4467 1.51 2.06 1.09 (1, 2)
DM Tau DM Tau 145 35.2 157.8 120 3580 0.24 1.30 0.39 10−8.3 (11, 32, 33)
Elia 2-20 Elias20 138 49.0 153.0 64 3890 2.23 3.29 0.48 10−6.9 (1, 2)
Elia 2-27 Elias27 116 56.2 119.0 254 3980 0.91 2.11 0.49 10−7.2 (1, 2)
HD143006 HD143006 165 18.6 169.0 90 5623 3.80 2.10 1.78 10−8.1 (1, 2)
MWC 480 MWC 480 147 36.5 147.5 135 8360 17.4 1.99 1.91 10−6.9 (7, 31)
J16255615–2420481 SR4 134 22.0 18.0 35 4074 1.17 2.18 0.68 10−6.9 (1, 2)
Sz114 Sz114 162 21.3 165.0 58 3162 0.20 1.51 0.17 10−9.1 (1, 2)
WaOph6 WaOph6 123 47.3 174.2 103 4169 2.88 2.18 0.68 10−6.6 (1, 2)
WSB52 WSB52 138 54.4 138.0 32 3715 0.70 2.03 0.48 10−7.6 (1, 2)

Notes. The bottom part of the table includes the sources for which the dust height could not be constrained. In the first column (“Name”), we indicate a SIMBAD compatible name (2MASS to be added before the names starting with “J”), while the second column (“Adopted”) shows the adopted name in the next tables. In the R column, the symbol (*) indicates that the reported R value is higher than the direct estimate from the literature. It must however not be considered as the true stellar radius as a higher value was only introduced to ensure significantly optically thin/bright models (see Sect. 3.3). The symbol (g) in Haro6-5B implies that Te f f and R were assumed because Haro6-5B does not have a direct measurement of these parameters and is a K5 star.

References. (1) Andrews et al. (2018); (2) Huang et al. (2018); (3) Clarke et al. (2018); (4) GRAVITY Collaboration (2023); (5) Donati et al. (2020); (6) Law et al. (2022); (7) Long et al. (2018); (8) Huang et al. (2020); (9) Espaillat et al. (2011); (10) Macías et al. (2018); (11) Simon et al. (2019); (12) Villenave et al. (2020); (13) Cieza et al. (2021); (14) Testi et al. (2022); (15) Villenave et al. (2019); (16) Facchini et al. (2020); (17) Donati et al. (2019); (18) Villenave et al. (2022); (19) van Terwisga et al. (2018); (20) Loomis et al. (2017); (21) Francis & van der Marel (2020); (22) Alcalá et al. (2017); (23) Manara et al. (2023); (24) Pinte et al. (2016); (25) Beck et al. (2010); (26) Stephens et al. (2023); (27) Keppler et al. (2018); (28) Haffert et al. (2019); (29) Ribas et al. (2024); (30) Mendigutía et al. (2011); (31) Mendigutía et al. (2013); (32) Kudo et al. (2018); (33) Hashimoto et al. (2021); (34) Martire et al. (2024)

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.