Notes. Overview of fitting performance when comparing the reconstructed SED to NIRSpec observations for the SED sample. The results solely using photometric observations $({\chi }_{v,phot}^2={\chi }_p^2)$ as well as fits to the full combination of photometry and spectroscopy $({\chi }_{v,spec}^2={\chi }_s^2)$ are compared to indicate how well the observed SEDs are represented in each template set. We note that the errors used to calculate (χ²) for each case come from the observed SEDs, and thus rely on the accuracy of the error estimate in these datasets. Although a few objects such as 110996 and 110319 are relatively well fit by some templates, others (e.g., 113585) seem entirely unrepresented in current template sets. It should be noted that ${\chi }_{spec}^2$ is occasionally greater than ${\chi }_{phot}^2$, which is ideally not to be expected. This is most likely associated with potential minor nonlinearities in the EAZY fitting procedure that can lead to slightly approximated solutions (G. Brammer, private communication).