Table 4
CEERS z > 5 photometric redshift performance metrics.
Template | Δbias,z>5 | σnmad,z>5 | ηf,z>5 | ηc,z>5 | sz>5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |
A22 | −5.5 ± 0.6 | ![]() |
26.1 ± 0.6 | 26.6 ± 0.6 | 99.5 ± 0.1 |
BlSFH | −11.9 ± 0.5 | 33.0 ± 0.5 | 27.7 ± 0.7 | 28.4 ± 0.7 | 99.3 ± 0.1 |
CaSFH | −16.4 ± 0.5 | ![]() |
35.8 ± 0.7 | 36.7 ± 0.7 | 99.1 ± 0.1 |
Ev3 | ![]() |
33.6 ± 0.5 | ![]() |
33.5 ± 0.9 | 98.5 ± 0.2 |
L23 | −7.2 ± 0.7 | 30.9 ± 0.6 | 26.3 ± 0.7 | 27.3 ± 0.7 | ![]() |
S23 | −2.2 ± 0.3 | 22.6 ± 0.5 | 22.4 ± 0.7 | 22.4 ± 0.7 | ![]() |
T22 | −2.9 ± 0.5 | 28.2 ± 0.5 | 24.1 ± 0.7 | 25.3 ± 0.7 | 98.8 ± 0.1 |
TwSPS | −30 ± 1 | 43.4 ± 0.4 | 46.3 ± 0.8 | 56 ± 1 | 90.0 ± 0.6 |
Notes. Overview of template performance within the zspec > 5 CEERS sample. Specific metrics are defined above (Sect. 3.1). The CEERS survey has a lower depth, and it can be seen that this requires caution when fitting in the high-redshift regime. In bias, deviation, and catastrophic fit proportion, S23 performs best, perhaps due to being supported by its smaller basis and thus larger constraint.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.