Open Access

Table F.2

As Table F.1 but for the stars with signs of binarity.

Source Teff [K] logM˙$\log \dot{M}$ [M yr-1] log(M˙fcl)$\log (\dot{M}\sqrt{f_\mathrm{cl}})$ [M yr-1] Reference Comments
VFTS-267 42500 −6.15 −5.30 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 51
44700 −5.93 −5.43 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v, from UV, fcl = 10
44100 −5.00 −5.00 Ramírez-Agudelo et al. (2017) Optical spectral fit
44700 −5.60 −5.10 Bestenlehner et al. (2014) Optical spectral fit, fcl = 10
Sk −71°46 37750 −5.68 −4.95 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 29
40100 −5.90 −5.40 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
38000 −4.93 −4.43 Ramachandran et al. (2018a) Optical + UV spectral fit, fcl = 10
38000 −5.72 −5.06 Ramachandran et al. (2018a) Optical + UV spectral fit, fcl = 20
41809 −4.89 −4.89 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
Sk −67°108 43500 −6.37 −5.59 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 36
44700 −6.20 −5.70 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
43985 −5.29 −5.29 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
Sk −71°19 39750 −7.20 −6.39 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 40
40400 −7.15 −6.65 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
Sk −70°115 34750 −5.73 −4.97 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 33
35400 −5.80 −5.30 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
39121 −5.24 −5.24 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
BI 173 34500 −6.71 −6.71 This work fcl not constrained
33400 −6.53 −6.03 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
33639 −5.18 −5.18 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
34500 −5.80 −5.80 Massey et al. (2009) Optical spectral fit,
Sk −68°155 31500 −5.85 −5.23 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 17
29900 −6.19 −5.69 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
29000 −6.19 −5.45 Alkousa et al. (2025) Optical + UV spectral fit, fcl = 30

Notes. In this overview we include only analyses in which both mass-loss rate and effective temperature were derived. For LH 114-7 there were no such studies. For computing M˙fcl$\dot{M}\sqrt{f_\mathrm{cl}}$, we assume fcl = 1 unless another clumping factor was adopted or derived from the fitting process.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.