Open Access

Table F.1

Overview of literature values of Teff, M˙$\dot{M}$, and M˙fcl$\dot{M}\sqrt{f_\textrm{cl}}$ for the presumed single stars of our sample (see also Table F.2).

Source Teff [K] logM˙$\log \dot{M}$ [M yr-1] log(M˙fcl)$\log (\dot{M}\sqrt{f_\mathrm{cl}})$ [M yr-1] Reference Comments
W61-28-23 45750 −6.25 −6.25 This work fcl not constrained
50600 −6.15 −5.65 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
47500 −5.60 −5.60 Massey et al. (2005) Optical spectral fit, v from UV
47000 −5.80 −5.80 Rivero González et al. (2012a) Optical spectral fit
Sk −67°167 38500 −5.66 −4.84 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 42
39700 −5.80 −5.30 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, from UV, fcl = 10
41809 −4.69 −4.69 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
47500 −4.85 −4.85 Puls et al. (1996) Optical spectral fit
44100 −5.35 −5.35 Leitherer (1988) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from Hα luminosity
ST 92-4-18 41500 −6.08 −5.33 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 32.
53300 −6.20 −5.70 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
Sk −67°69 41500 −6.18 −5.65 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 11
48200 −6.20 −5.70 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
43985 −5.33 −5.33 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
45500 −5.56 −5.56 Leitherer (1988) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from Hα luminosity
Farina-88 43750 −6.35 −5.85 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 10.
57200 −6.55 −6.05 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
LMCE 078-1 37750 −6.01 −5.16 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 50.
42400 −6.12 −5.62 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
Sk −67°111 35000 −6.01 −5.26 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 31
37700 −6.05 −5.55 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, from v, fcl = 10
37415 −5.15 −5.15 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
33000 −5.70 −5.70 Fullerton et al. (2000) UV spectral fit
37000 −5.60 −5.60 Leitherer (1988) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from Hα luminosity
N11-018 37000 −6.03 −5.19 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 48.
37700 −6.27 −5.77 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
Sk −69°50 34500 −6.16 −5.39 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 35
35400 −6.53 −6.03 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
Sk −71°50 36250 −6.43 −5.61 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 43
35400 −6.53 −6.03 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, from v, fcl = 10
39121 −5.38 −5.38 Massa et al. (201?) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
Sk −69°104 34500 −5.93 −5.11 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 44
33400 −5.90 −5.40 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, from v, fcl = 10
37415 −5.19 −5.19 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
Sk −68°16 37000 −6.22 −5.39 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 45
35400 −6.23 −5.73 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, from v, fcl = 10
36689 −5.32 −5.32 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
LH 9-34 32250 −5.80 −5.41 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 6.
29900 −6.03 −5.53 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
Sk −66°171 32250 −6.18 −6.18 This work Clumping parameters not constrained
29900 −5.99 −5.49 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, from UV, fcl = 10
30824 −5.15 −5.15 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
29854 −6.07 −5.33 Alkousa et al. (2025) Optical + UV spectral fit, fcl = 30
Sk −71°41 31000 −6.55 −5.81 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 30
29900 −6.22 −5.72 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
33021 −5.15 −5.15 Massa et al. (2017) Teff from spectral type, M˙$\dot{M}$ from mid-IR excess
30000 −6.09 −5.59 Ramachandran et al. (2018b) Optical + UV spectral fit, fcl = 10
29200 −6.03 −5.53 Alkousa et al. (2025) Optical + UV spectral fit, fcl = 10
Sk −67°5 27500 −6.64 −5.87 This work Best fitting clumping factor: fcl = 34
26800 −5.95 −5.45 Bestenlehner et al. (2025) Optical spectral fit, v from UV, fcl = 10
25600 −6.05 −5.55 Alkousa et al. (2025) Optical + UV spectral fit, fcl = 10

Notes. In this overview we include only analyses in which both mass-loss rate and effective temperature were derived. For computing M˙fcl$\dot{M}\sqrt{f_\mathrm{cl}}$, we assume fcl = 1 unless another clumping factor was adopted or derived from the fitting process.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.