ALMAGAL - III. Compact source catalog: Fragmentation statistics and physical evolution of the core population

Open Access

Table 2

Flux completeness analysis.

Group	N. of targets	σ_rms range (mJy/beam)	$\begin{array}{l} F_{INT}^{inj} \\ (mJy) \end{array}$ $\eqalign{ & F_{{\rm{INT}}}^{{\rm{inj}}} \cr & ({\rm{mJy}}) \cr}$	$\begin{array}{l} F_{INT}^{compl} \\ (mJy) \end{array}$ $\eqalign{ & F_{{\rm{INT}}}^{{\rm{compl }}} \cr & ({\rm{mJy}}) \cr}$
1	53	<0.06	0.2–2	0.58
2	769	0.06–0.1	0.5–2.5	0.94
3	191	>0.1	0.7–2.4	2.05

Notes. Summary of the flux completeness analysis for the three different groups of fields selected based on their rms noise level (Col. 3). Columns 4 and 5 report the range of integrated flux levels injected and the derived completeness limit, respectively. The integrated flux ranges were chosen in order to more accurately sample in each group the specific range where the 90% detection threshold defining the flux completeness level lied.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.