Table 3.
Star formation and dynamical properties, as well as polarisation pattern classification results of analysed sample.
| Galaxy | SFR | ΣSFR | Mstar | sSFR |
 |
RHI | Pol. pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [M⊙ yr−1] | [M⊙ yr−1 kpc−2] | [M⊙] | [yr−1] | [kpc] | |||
| ×10−3 | ×1010 | ×10−10 | |||||
| NGC 660 ( † ) | 3.31 ± 0.32 | 36.10 ± 3.10 | 2.10 ± 0.03 | 1.58 ± 0.15 | 9.56 | 17.55 | Small-scale |
| NGC 891 | 1.88 ± 0.18 | 3.81 ± 0.36 | 4.13 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 9.60 ( * ) | 18.67 | X shaped |
| NGC 2683 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 3.54 ± 0.40 | 1.49 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 8.72 | 6.55 | Disc-dominated |
| NGC 2820 | 1.35 ± 0.14 | 9.00 ± 0.96 | 0.47 ± 0.01 | 2.89 ± 0.31 | 8.85 ( * *) | 7.80 | X shaped |
| NGC 3044 | 1.75 ± 0.16 | 6.79 ± 0.60 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 2.65 ± 0.25 | 9.56 | 17.60 | X shaped |
| NGC 3079 | 5.08 ± 0.45 | 9.57 ± 0.84 | 4.73 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.10 | 10.00 | 29.40 | X shaped |
| NGC 3432 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 6.36 ± 0.69 | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 5.10 ± 0.61 | 9.38 ( * * * ) | 14.23 | Small-scale |
| NGC 3448 | 1.78 ± 0.18 | 14.50 ± 1.50 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 3.16 ± 0.33 | 9.89 | 25.64 | X shaped |
| NGC 3556 | 3.57 ± 0.30 | 7.32 ± 0.62 | 2.81 ± 0.04 | 1.27 ± 0.11 | 9.68 | 20.22 | Small-scale |
| NGC 3628 | 1.41 ± 0.12 | 2.99 ± 0.26 | 2.83 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 9.40 ( + ) | 15.57 | Disc-dominated |
| NGC 3735 | 6.23 ± 0.57 | 6.71 ± 0.61 | 14.92 ± 0.21 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | – | – | X shaped |
| NGC 4157 | 1.76 ± 0.18 | 8.15 ± 0.83 | 2.92 ± 0.04 | 0.60 ± 0.06 | 9.72 | 21.22 | X shaped |
| NGC 4192 | 0.78 ± 0.07 | 1.67 ± 0.15 | 3.40 ± 0.05 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 9.63 ( + +) | 21.91 ( + +) | Disc-dominated ( † †) |
| NGC 4217 | 1.89 ± 0.18 | 4.40 ± 0.42 | 4.74 ± 0.07 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 9.44 | 15.29 | X shaped |
| NGC 4565 | 0.96 ± 0.09 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 6.04 ± 0.08 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 9.80 | 23.14 | Disc-dominated |
| NGC 4631 | 2.62 ± 0.22 | 6.10 ± 0.52 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 2.73 ± 0.23 | 9.33 | 13.45 | X shaped |
| NGC 4666 | 10.50 ± 0.92 | 12.80 ± 1.10 | 12.48 ± 0.18 | 0.84 ± 0.07 | 10.04 | 30.78 | X shaped |
| NGC 5775 | 7.56 ± 0.65 | 9.40 ± 0.81 | 7.72 ± 0.10 | 0.98 ± 0.09 | 10.09 | 32.82 | X shaped |
Notes. Star formation rates and star formation rate surface densities (taken from Vargas et al. 2019), stellar mass estimates (taken from Li et al. 2016), specific star formation rates, HI mass and -size (if not indicated otherwise, HI masses and size were taken from Zheng et al. (2022) and HI sizes were derived using the HI-size-mass relation (Wang et al. 2016, Eq. 2)), and total mass estimates. ( * )Taken from Oosterloo et al. (2007). ( * *)Taken from Reakes (1979). ( * * * )Taken from Wilcots et al. (1996). ( + )Taken from Rots (1978). ( + +)Taken from Wang et al. (2016). ( † )We note that NGC 660 shows strong interaction features in the optical as well as the radio continuum regime, which most probably influences its halo structure. ( † †)NGC 4192 is an edge case, which could also be classified as small-scale. Q I and Q II show field vectors that are strongly aligned with the disc. The south of the galaxy shows a more patchy polarisation pattern but overall fewer data points.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.