Table 3
Spectroscopic reference studies. Top part: classical spectroscopy, bottom part: machine-learning approaches.
Reference | Instrument | Wavelength (Å) | Resolving power R | Model/Method |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cristofari et al. (2022a) | SPIRou | 9670–23 200 | 70 000 | MARCS |
Mann et al. (2015) | SNIFS | 3200–9700 | 1000 | SED fitting |
Mann et al. (2015) | SpeX | 8000–24 000 | 2000 | SED fitting |
Maldonado et al. (2020) | HARPS/HARPS-N | 5300–6900 | 115 000 | Pseudo EW(d) |
Passegger et al. (2019)(a) | CARMENES | 7000–15 200 | >80000(c) | PHOENIX |
Sarmento et al. (2021) | APOGEE | 15 000–17 000 | 22 500 | MARCS |
Souto et al. (2022) | APOGEE | 15 000–17 000 | 22 500 | MARCS |
Birky et al. (2020)(b) | APOGEE | 15 000–17 000 | 22 500 | The Cannon |
Passegger et al. (2022) | CARMENES | 8800–8835 | >80000(c) | Deep Learning A |
Passegger et al. (2022) | CARMENES | 6477–12 816 | >80000(c) | Deep Learning C2 |
Notes. (a)In Passegger et al. (2019) the log g is given by evolutionary models (PARSEC) corresponding to Teff and [Fe/H] at each step of the spectrum fit.(b)Birky et al. (2020) only derived the parameters Teff and [Fe/H], all other studies Teff, log g, and [Fe/H].(c)The resolving power for CARMENES is R ∼ 94 600 and R ∼ 80 500 in the visible and NIR, respectively. (d) Maldonado et al. (2020) used ratios of pseudo-equivalent widths of spectral features described in Maldonado et al. (2015).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.