Open Access

Table 2.

Summary of the PENCIL CODE simulations.

Run Geom/B.C. r/R θ/π ϕ/π 0 ( t 0 ) $ \ell_0(\tilde{t}_0) $ 0 ( t 2 ) $ \ell_0(\tilde{t}_2) $ Lu ( t 1 ) $ \mathrm{Lu}(\tilde{t}_1) $ Lu ( t 2 ) $ \mathrm{Lu}(\tilde{t}_2) $ k 0 ξ ( t 0 ) $ k_0\xi (\tilde{t}_0) $ χ ( t 0 ) $ \chi(\tilde{t}_0) $ Mesh points
R1 Cart/PC-VF 0.9–1 0–1 0–1 200 50 260 132 0.50 1.19 64 × 20482
R2 Sph/PC-VF 0.9–1 0.1–0.9 0–1 200 60 251 124 0.60 1.12 64 × 20482
R3 Cart/PC-VF 0.8–1 0–1 0–1 200 30 361 202 0.61 1.16 128 × 20482
R4 Cart/PC-VF 0.8–1 0–0.5 0–0.5 200 10 487 272 0.61 1.15 128 × 10242
R5 Cart/PC-VF 0.8–1 0–0.5 0–0.5 50 10 724 464 0.46 0.87 128 × 10282
R6 Cart/P 0.9–1 0–1 0–1 200 60 283 168 0.61 1.19 64 × 20482

Notes. Cartesian simulations are indicated by ‘Cart’, while spherical simulations are denoted by ‘Sph’. Simulations with perfect conductor boundary conditions on the inner surface and vertical field boundary conditions on the outer surface in the radial directions are labeled as ‘PC-VF’. By contrast, simulations with periodic boundary conditions in the radial directions are labeled as ‘P’. Data is shown at specific times: t 1 = η t 1 / R 2 = 2 × 10 6 $ \tilde{t}_1=\eta t_1/R^2 = 2 \times 10^{-6} $ and t 2 = η t 2 / R 2 = 2 × 10 5 $ \tilde{t}_2=\eta t_2/R^2 = 2 \times 10^{-5} $. We note that 0 = k0R for the Cartesian runs.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.