Open Access

Table A.1

Hub-Filament Systems (HFS) at parsec scales: Literature results ordered by mass.

HFS MHFS LHFS (1) HFS (2) HFS (3) References
[M] [pc] [M Myr−1] [M pc−1 Myr−1]
targets with estimates

DR21 15120 4.1 4150 1100 Schneider et al. (2011); Hu et al. (2021)
SDC335.579-0.272 5500 ~1 2500 ~2500 Peretto et al. (2013)
G6.55-0.1 4520 7.6 1778 234 Sen et al. (2024)
G323.46-0.08 3072 2.4 1280 506 Ma et al. (2023)
G148.24+00.41 2100 2.2 675 306 Rawat et al. (2024)
Mon-R2 >1700(4) ~1 500 ~500 Treviño-Morales et al. (2019)
OMC-1 >1500(4) 0.8 385 481 Hacar et al. (2017a)
G310.142+0.758 1280 0.6 2400 2166 Yang et al. (2023)
G326.607+00.799 1099 1.38 170 123 He et al. (2023)
G22-C1 590 0.39 360 923 Yuan et al. (2018)
NGC 1333 580 0.8 100 ~125 Hacar et al. (2017b); Walsh et al. (2006)
SDC13 ~400 ~1 15 25 Peretto et al. (2014)
G14.225-0.506 South 377 1.15 130 89 Busquet et al. (2013); Chen et al. (2019)
G14.225-0.506 North 297 1.12 100 116 Busquet et al. (2013); Chen et al. (2019)
Aquila-Rift >100 0.5 30 60 Kirk et al. (2013)

surveys without estimates

12× HFS 1353-18×104 0.9-2.46 Tokuda et al. (2023)
39× HFS 200-4900 0.48-1.52 Morii et al. (2023)
5× HFS 135-3739 0.27-0.95 Anderson et al. (2021)

Notes. (1) When the HFS radius R is provided we estimate the corresponding length as LHFS = 2R. (2) Most accretion measurements are affected by projection effects and are therefore subject of relatively large uncertainties (see Peretto et al. 2014, , for a discussion). (3) Estimated as HFS = HFS /LHFS. (4) Lower mass limit due to the large contribution of stellar objects.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.