Table 5
Samples used for comparison of NH3 deuteration in the G202 region.
Sample | Size | NH2D (%) | [NH2D]/[NH3] | R[NH2D] (pc) | R[NH3] (pc) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Massive pre-protocluster cores in two regions High-mass ATLASGAL | 32 | 59 | 0.06–0.37 | ~0.2/~0.06 | ~0.3/~0.1 | Pillai et al. (2011) |
clumps Pre-protostellar cores of | 992 | 39 | 0.007–1.6 | 0.74/0.56/0.43 | 0.76/1.18 | Wienen et al. (2021) |
a UCHII region Low-mass cores in | 7 | 100 | <0.06–0.8 | 0.04 × 0.03 | 1.07 | Busquet et al. (2010) |
a massive star protocluster Dense cores of a low-mass | 55 | 31 | 0.11–0.39 | ~0.02 | 0.06 × 0.03 | Li et al. (2021) |
star forming region | 22 | 59 | <0.04–0.35 | ~0.12 | 0.05 | Galloway-Sprietsma et al. (2022) |
G202 | 5 | 100 | 0.02–0.3 | 0.10 | 0.14 | This article |
Notes. Columns: (1) type of sample, (2) the number of elements in the sample, (3) detection rate of NH2D in %, (4) deuterium fractionation, (5) effective spatial resolution of the NH2D observations, (6) effective spatial resolution of the NH3 observations, and (7) article reference. The two resolutions in Pillai et al.’s work correspond to the two studied clouds. In the work of Wienen et al., the three NH2D resolution values correspond to measurements done with the Mopra telescope at 86 GHz, and with the IRAM telescope for 86 GHz and 110 GHz, respectively. The two NH3 values correspond to measurements made with the Effelsberg telescope (Wienen et al. 2012) and with the Parkes 64 m telescope (Wienen et al. 2018), respectively. The values for both NH2D and NH3 spatial resolutions were calculated for the median distance of 4 kpc of the ATLASGAL catalogue. Busquet et al. (2010) used the VLA NH3 measurements of Palau et al. (2007), and Galloway-Sprietsma et al. (2022) used the NH3 measurements of Keown et al. (2017), therefore we list the spatial resolution of these datasets in the respective column. The distances used to calculate the spatial resolutions: 7.4 kpc and 3.4 kpc for Pillai et al. (2011), a median distance of 4 kpc for Wienen et al. (2021), 2 kpc for (Busquet et al. 2010), 1.3 kpc for Li et al. (2021), and 350 pc for Galloway-Sprietsma et al. (2022).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.