Open Access
Table 3.
Quality metric comparison between the baseline and our ITI method.
| PSNR | SSIM | MAE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Frames | Baseline | ITI | Baseline | ITI | Baseline | ITI |
| G-band | 16.23 ± 1.78 | 20.30 ± 1.61 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| Blue Continuum | 14.4 ± 2.05 | 18.20 ± 1.90 | 0.33 ± 0.07 | 0.65 ± 0.07 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.09 ± 0.02 |
| 10 Frames | ||||||
| G-band | 16.23 ± 1.78 | 18.20 ± 1.87 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.55 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.02 |
| Blue Continuum | 14.4 ± 2.05 | 17.19 ± 1.68 | 0.33 ± 0.07 | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
Notes. Comparison of the full-image bursts (100 frames) and ten frames as input using the test set. ITI shows an improvement in all metrics for both wavelengths, G-band and Blue continuum. The error range corresponds to ±1σ.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.