Exploiting the diversity of modeling methods to probe systematic biases in strong lensing analyses

Open Access

Table B.2.

Comparison of best-fit log-likelihood ( $ln L (\tilde{η})$ $\ln{L(\tilde{\boldsymbol{\eta}})}$ ) and corresponding BIC values (Eqs. 6 and B.1) considering different maximum order of the shapelets basis set n_max for the Sérsic+Shapelets modeling method (and correspinding number of parameters n_par). The number of data pixels is 6376 used to constrain the model (within a circular mask of $4 \overset{″}{.} 5$ $4{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}5$ radius).

n_max	n_par	$ln L (\tilde{η})$ $\ln{L(\tilde{\boldsymbol{\eta}})}$	BIC
3	28	-3581.4	7408.0
4	33	-3562.8	7414.7
5	39	-3485.1	7311.9
6	46	-3502.2	7407.1
7	54	-3434.2	7341.4

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.