Open Access

Fig. 13

image

Download original image

The LSTM-FCNN in comparison to the RF developed in Huber et al. (2022) and PyCS used in Huber et al. (2019). The exact values are listed in Table 3. In terms of precision, the LSTM-FCNN outperforms the other two approaches by roughly a factor of three.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.