Table 2.
Properties of our detailed binary models.
| max log Ṁ/ | Outcome | Outcome | Outcome | Outcome | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | M1i/ M⊙ | M2i/ M⊙ | Pi/ d | Case | M⊙/yr | det. model | with max(Ṁ) | with Eq. (9) | of Sect. 3.2 |
| 1 | 10 | 4 | 1.8 | A | −3.22 | Stable, L2O | Stable, L2O | Stable, stripping | L2O |
| 2 | 10 | 4 | 10 | Br | −2.92 | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 3 | 10 | 4 | 56 | Br | −2.71 | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 4 | 10 | 4 | 316 | Bc | – | No solution | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 5 | 10 | 6 | 1.8 | A | −3.82 | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stripping |
| 6 | 10 | 6 | 10 | Br | −3.04 | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stripping |
| 7 | 10 | 6 | 56 | Br | −2.75 | Stable, L2O | Stable, contact | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 8 | 10 | 6 | 316 | Bc | – | No solution | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 9 | 10 | 8 | 1.8 | A | −4.30 | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stripping |
| 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | Br | −3.07 | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stripping |
| 11 | 10 | 8 | 56 | Br | −2.75 | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | Stable, stripping | L2O |
| 12 | 10 | 8 | 316 | Bc | – | No solution | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 13 | 30 | 12 | 1.8 | A | −2.42 | Unstable, L2O | Stable, L2O | Stable, stripping | Stripping |
| 14 | 30 | 12 | 10 | Br | −1.96 | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 15 | 30 | 12 | 56 | Br | −2.24 | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
| 16 | 30 | 12 | 316 | Br | −2.18 | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | Unstable, L2O | L2O |
Notes. Initial masses M1i and M2i and initial orbital periods Pi of our detailed binary models and the case of RLO through which they pass. We distinguish between Case B with a donor with a radiative (Br) and a convective (Bc) envelope. The maximum mass-transfer rates of the detailed binary models (ε = 50%) are given as well. We display the outcomes of the RLO according to the detailed binary models (Sect.2.3.2), the radius estimate using the maximum mass-transfer rate of the detailed binary models (the crosses in Fig. 6), the radius estimate based on Eq. (9) (the plusses in Fig. 6), and the outcome from Sect. 3.2. We qualify the stability of the swelling and the occurrence of L2 overflow (L2O), contact, or neither (donor stripping).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.