Open Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449165]


Issue
A&A
Volume 690, October 2024
Article Number C2
Number of page(s) 3
Section Letters to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451843e
Published online 04 October 2024

We found a mistake in the code used to compute the parameters m, q, and σint of the Ep, iLiso and Ep, iLcoll correlations reported in Tables 1, 2, and 3. We verified to see whether the essence of our results remains unaffected, and in fact the statistical evidence of our conclusions is even stronger than what was reported in the Letter.

For each burst in the sample, we recomputed the aforementioned parameters and provide the correct values in Tables 1, 2, and 3, which are meant to replace those reported in the Letter. We also provide the amended version of Fig. 1. Not only do the general conclusions that we found remain valid, but the main result shown in Sect. 3.1 improved. In fact, with reference to that section, the statistical significance goes from 4.2 (Pt = 2.69 × 10−5) to 5.9σ (Gaussian,Pt = 4.55 × 10−9).

Table 1.

Sample of GRBs with redshift z, jet half-opening angle θj – both in the homogeneous interstellar medium (ISM) and wind profile (W) –, the Lorentz factor Γ0, and the minimum variability timescale (MVT).

Table 2.

Best-fit parameters of the Ep, iL correlation (90% confidence) for the overall sample 𝒮 and for the sub-samples 𝒮(ISM) and 𝒮(W) of time-resolved spectra of GRBs with available information on θ j ( ISM ) $ \theta_{\mathrm{j}}^{\mathrm{(ISM)}} $ and on θ j ( W ) $ \theta_{\mathrm{j}}^{\mathrm{(W)}} $, respectively.

Table 3.

Best-fit parameters of the Ep, iLiso correlation (90% confidence) of the GRBs with the highest S/N obtained including BGO data with a better viewing angle (mBGO, qBGO, and σint, BGO using the Band function; mCPL, qCPL, and σint, CPL using the CPL model) and NaI alone (m, q, and σint).

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Top panel: Time-resolved Ep, iLiso relation for the overall sample 𝒮. Bottom panel: Collimation-corrected Ep, iLcoll relation for the subset 𝒮(ISM) of GRBs with available information on θ j ( ISM ) $ \theta_{\mathrm{j}}^{\mathrm{(ISM)}} $. In both panels the best-fit model along with the 1-σint, t region (shaded area) is shown, while median uncertainties along both axes are shown in the top left.

Referring to Sect. 3.3, we provide here the correct values of the parameters of GRB 090102: m B = 0 . 82 0.32 + 0.33 $ m_{\mathrm{B}} = 0.82_{-0.32}^{+0.33} $, q B = 2 . 46 0.20 + 0.18 $ q_{\mathrm{B}} = 2.46_{-0.20}^{+0.18} $, and σ int , B = 0 . 24 0.08 + 0.17 $ \sigma_{\mathrm{int, B}} = 0.24_{-0.08}^{+0.17} $.

References

  1. Camisasca, A. E., Guidorzi, C., Amati, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chand, V., Chattopadhyay, T., Oganesyan, G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 70 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ghirlanda, G., Nappo, F., Ghisellini, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhao, W., Zhang, J.-C., Zhang, Q.-X., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhu, Z.-P., Lei, W.-H., Malesani, D. B., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 118 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

© The Authors 2024

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

All Tables

Table 1.

Sample of GRBs with redshift z, jet half-opening angle θj – both in the homogeneous interstellar medium (ISM) and wind profile (W) –, the Lorentz factor Γ0, and the minimum variability timescale (MVT).

Table 2.

Best-fit parameters of the Ep, iL correlation (90% confidence) for the overall sample 𝒮 and for the sub-samples 𝒮(ISM) and 𝒮(W) of time-resolved spectra of GRBs with available information on θ j ( ISM ) $ \theta_{\mathrm{j}}^{\mathrm{(ISM)}} $ and on θ j ( W ) $ \theta_{\mathrm{j}}^{\mathrm{(W)}} $, respectively.

Table 3.

Best-fit parameters of the Ep, iLiso correlation (90% confidence) of the GRBs with the highest S/N obtained including BGO data with a better viewing angle (mBGO, qBGO, and σint, BGO using the Band function; mCPL, qCPL, and σint, CPL using the CPL model) and NaI alone (m, q, and σint).

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Top panel: Time-resolved Ep, iLiso relation for the overall sample 𝒮. Bottom panel: Collimation-corrected Ep, iLcoll relation for the subset 𝒮(ISM) of GRBs with available information on θ j ( ISM ) $ \theta_{\mathrm{j}}^{\mathrm{(ISM)}} $. In both panels the best-fit model along with the 1-σint, t region (shaded area) is shown, while median uncertainties along both axes are shown in the top left.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.