Open Access

Table 5.

Comparison of bias, fraction of outliers, and accuracy between photo-z computed with CIRCLEZ, LEPHARE, and DNNZ, for extragalactic sources in the eROSITA/eFEDS field.

Survey Number of sources bias accuracy fraction of outliers
σNMAD η [%]
LEPHARE Region 1 3472 0.003 0.049 14.1
DNNZ Region 1 3419 −0.001 0.039 16.7
LEPHARE Region 2 1884 0.006 0.068 23.8
DNNZ Region 2 1808 −0.004 0.052 27.2

CIRCLEZ on test&validation 2913 −0.005 0.067 11.6
CIRCLEZ on training 11 651 −0.004 0.049 7.2
CIRCLEZ on training, test, and validation combined 14 564 −0.004 0.055 8.6

CIRCLEZ on eFEDS test&validation 1913 −0.006 0.068 11.9
CIRCLEZ on eFEDS training 8032 −0.004 0.052 7.8
CIRCLEZ on eFEDS all 10 044 −0.005 0.052 8.1

CIRCLEZ on CSC2 416 −0.009 0.055 12.3
CIRCLEZ on Chandra-COSMOS Legacy 1699 −0.041 0.124 32.4
CIRCLEZ on Chandra-COSMOS Legacy i mag < 21.6 813 −0.010 0.067 10.1

Notes. The values for LEPHARE and DNNZ are taken directly from Salvato et al. (2022) for comparison. While the selection of the templates for LEPHARE is based on the same sample used for assessing the quality of photo-zs, the training for DNNZ (CIRCLEZ) is partially (completely) independent from the test and validation sample used here. The quality of CIRCLEZ exceeds the one obtained by both LEPHARE and DNNZ in the area outside KiDS, demonstrating the strength of the method in general and particularly where there is a lack of NIR photometry.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.