Table 5.
Comparison between full available coverage and restricted coverage.
| Centroid | Max angle | Hemisphere | Pairwise | MRL | Wedge | Combined | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| Full cover | 8.8 | 7.4 | 5.9 | 13.2 | 13.2 | 16.2 | 20.6 |
| Restricted cover | 7.4 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 7.4 | 8.8 | 7.4 | 14.7 |
Notes. We show the percentages of lopsided systems for the entire dataset, both for the full coverage available and when coverage is limited to within a projected 200 kpc from the host. Columns: (1–6) percentage of statistically significant lopsided distributions for the different metrics; centroid, maximum opening angle, hemisphere, mean pairwise angle, MRL, and wedge, (7) percentage of systems that are found to be significant under any of the metrics.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.