Open Access

Table 1

RU Lup model configurations compared to VLTI GRAVITY data.

Mag. accretion I Mag. accretion II Disk wind I Disk wind II Hybrid model I Hybrid model II
Axisymmetric Non-axisymmetric Single peaked Double peaked Cool + compact Hot + extended
(MA I) (MA II) (DW I) (DW II) (HM I) (HM II)
R* [R] 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.5
M* [M] 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.2 0.8
T* [K] 4050 4050 4050 4050 4050 4050
P* [days] 7 7 7 7 9.05 7
Rco [R*] 5.71 5.71 5.71 5.71 8.1 5.71
Rmi [R*] 7 7 6 7
δRm [R*] 2 2 1 2
M˙acc [108 M yr1]$\[\dot{M}_{\text {acc }}\left[10^{-8} ~M_{\odot} ~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}\right]\]$ 23 23 10 23
Tmag [K] 8600 8600 7100 8600
Rwi [R*] 7.1 9.1 7.1 9.1
δRw [R*] 5 3 8 3
dfp [R*] 15 15 15 15
Rdd [R*] 14.5 13 13 13
βwind 0.62 0.05 0.2 0.05
αwind 0.4 0.7 0 0.7
zcrit [au] 0.0516 0.02 0.005 0.02
Mloss [10−8 M yr−1] 5.1 12 10 12
βma [deg] 0 30 0 0

Notes. Descriptions of the physical nature of the respective model parameters are given in Sec. 3.2 for the accretion model and in Sec. 3.3 for the disk wind model. Note that Rco is implicitly defined by the stellar parameters.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.