Jet formation in post-AGB binaries - Confronting cold magnetohydrodynamic disc wind models with observations

Open Access

Table 4.

Fitting parameters and $χ_{ν}^{2}$ $\chi^2_\nu$ values for the best fitting disc wind models.

Object	#MDW	i	r_in	r_out	Ṁ_in	T_wind	$χ_{ν}^{2}$ $\chi^2_\nu$	Ṁ_out	Ṁ_wind^(a)
		(° )	(R₂)	(R_RL, 2)	(M_⊙/yr)	(K)		(M_⊙/yr)	(M_⊙/yr)
HD 52961	4	72	1	0.9	10⁻⁴	4200	5.32	3 × 10⁻⁴	1 × 10⁻⁴
BD+46°442	3	56	5	0.8	10⁻⁵	5250	6.44	1.2 × 10⁻⁵	1 × 10⁻⁶
TW Cam	3	24	5	0.9	10⁻³	4850	5.42	1.4 × 10⁻³	2 × 10⁻⁴
IRAS 19135+3937	4	48	1	0.9	10⁻⁵	5050	3.30	2.4 × 10⁻⁵	7 × 10⁻⁶
HP Lyr	4	29	20	0.3	10⁻⁴	5000	4.91	1.4 × 10⁻⁴	2 × 10⁻⁵

Notes. In addition to the fitted parameters, we also show the feeding rate at the outer disc rim and the wind mas-loss rate.

^(a)

Ṁ_wind denotes the mass-loss rate of one of the wind lobes. Since the wind is bipolar, conservation of mass implies Ṁ_out =Ṁ_in + 2 Ṁ_wind.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.