Open Access

Table 10.

Comparison of Planck cluster masses from the COMB-CL analysis of public surveys with literature values.

vs LC2

Survey Ncl χa, b2 pa, b ΔCBI ± ΔSBI
HSC-SSP S16a 4 1.00 0.91 0.06 ± 0.26
CFHTLenS 8 0.52 ≲1 0.04 ± 0.06
KiDS DR4 5 1.85 0.87 0.03 ± 0.14
DES SV1 5 0.30 ≲1 0.11 ± 0.09
RCSLenS 23 25.6 0.37 0.19 ± 0.43

vs PSZ2LenS

Survey Ncl χa, b2 pa, b ΔCBI ± ΔSBI
HSC-SSP S16a 2 0.17 0.92 0.08 ± 0.11
CFHTLenS 8 0.52 ≲1 0.04 ± 0.06
KiDS DR4 1 1.50 0.22 0.52
RCSLenS 22 20.3 0.56 0.21 ± 0.33

Notes. For each survey, we report the number of clusters Ncl; χa, b2 and its excess probability, pa, b = p(χ2> χa, b2); and Δ, the biweight location and scale of the difference of the mass estimates. In the top part of the table, masses are compared with estimates from the LC2 catalogue. In the bottom part, the masses are compared with those from the PSZ2LenS sample (Sereno et al. 2017).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.