Table 3.
Best-fit parameters of the radius–stellar mass scaling relations.
Relation | Sample | M⋆(M⊙) | β | α | σobs | σback | σmass | σint | r |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edge radii | Cluster | 105 − 1011 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | −2.88 ± 0.10 | 0.096 | 0.057 | 0.052 | 0.057 | 0.93 |
vs. stellar mass | Group & satellite | 105.5 − 1010 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | −2.67 ± 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.064 | 0.066 | 0.077 | 0.94 |
LV/Nearly isolated | 105.5 − 109 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | −2.79 ± 0.33 | 0.14 | 0.055 | 0.093 | 0.089 | 0.87 | |
C22/Nearly isolated | 107 − 1010 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | −2.07 ± 0.24 | 0.12 | 0.052 | 0.079 | 0.073 | 0.85 | |
![]() |
Total Sample | 105 − 1011 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | −2.94 ± 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.057 | 0.066 | 0.068 | 0.94 |
Effective radii | Cluster | 105 − 1011 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | −2.11 ± 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.073 | 0.080 | 0.10 | 0.79 |
vs. stellar mass | Group & satellite | 105.5 − 1010 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | −2.15 ± 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.074 | 0.076 | 0.16 | 0.78 |
LV/Nearly isolated | 105.5 − 109 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | −2.29 ± 0.48 | 0.18 | 0.087 | 0.061 | 0.15 | 0.68 | |
C22/Nearly isolated | 107 − 1010 | 0.30 ± 0.045 | −2.41 ± 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.062 | 0.16 | 0.65 | |
![]() |
Total Sample | 105 − 1011 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | −2.19 ± 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.087 | 0.074 | 0.14 | 0.80 |
Notes. The estimated dispersion of the scaling relations due to uncertainties in the image background (σback) and stellar mass (σmass) estimation are also included. We used these values to calculate the intrinsic uncertainty (σint) of the scaling relation. The relations are of the form log10R = β log10M⋆ + α, where R is the radius of interest. The intrinsic dispersion of the relation was computed using , and r is the Pearson correlation coefficient. If we additionally account for the typical uncertainty in visual identifications of edge radii (0.04 dex; Chamba et al. 2022), then the intrinsic uncertainty in the Redge − M⋆ relation for the total sample drops to ∼0.06 dex.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.