Table 3.
Best-fit slopes obtained by fitting a straight line, in linear or logarithmic scale, for various combinations of the best-fit model parameters.
| Parameters | Space | Slope | ρS |
|---|---|---|---|
| h (rg) vs. Ltransf/Ldisc | linear | 56.92 ± 22.94 | 0.27 |
| (2.5σ) | (0.33) | ||
| Γ vs. Ltransf/Ldisc | linear | −1.00 ± 0.35 | −0.56 |
| (2.8σ) | (0.03) | ||
| FX/⟨FX⟩ vs. Ltransf/Ldisc | linear | 0.04 ± 0.46 | 0.00 |
| (0.1σ) | (1.00) | ||
| FUV/⟨FUV⟩ vs. Ltransf/Ldisc | linear | −1.41 ± 0.30 | −0.79 |
| (4.6σ) | (0.0004) | ||
| Γ vs. h (rg) | linear | −0.006 ± 0.004 | −0.46 |
| (1.6σ ) | (0.08) | ||
| FX/⟨FX⟩ vs. h (rg) | log | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.57 |
| (2.5σ) | (0.03) | ||
| FUV/⟨FUV⟩ vs. h (rg) | log | 0.19 ± 0.08 | 0.31 |
| (2.4σ) | (0.26) | ||
| FX/⟨FX⟩ vs. Γ | log | 0.62 ± 0.21 | 0.26 |
| (3.0σ) | (0.35) | ||
| FUV/⟨FUV⟩ vs. Γ | linear | 0.33 ± 0.16 | 0.37 |
| (2.1σ) | (0.18) | ||
| FUV/⟨FUV⟩ vs. FX/⟨FX⟩ | linear | 1.13 ± 0.11 | 0.38 |
| (9.9σ) | (0.16) |
Notes. Values in parenthesis below the best-fit slopes indicate the significance of the hypothesis that the slope is different than zero. In the last column, we list the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the null hypothesis probability (values in parenthesis).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.