Open Access

Table 5

Overview of the results of different baseline models for the HARPS datasets.

Dataset Baseline model Rb (R) Mb (M) eb Rc (R) Mc (M) ec
DRS Carleo et al. (2020) 2.68 ± 0.19 7.2 ± 0.7 0.16 ± 0.08 5.09 ± 0.16 16.4 ± 1.1 0.15 ± 0.04
Polynomials 2.69 ± 0.11 6.6 ± 0.8 0.12 ± 0.07 5.03 ± 0.07 15.0 ± 1.3 0.23 ± 0.04
SHO-GP 2.61 ± 0.08 7.2 ± 0.7 0.18 ± 0.04 5.06 ± 0.07 12.7 ± 1.4 0.22 ± 0.04

SNF Polynomials 2.72 ± 0.11 7.0 ± 0.9 0.10 ± 0.06 5.00 ± 0.08 14.7 ± 1.4 0.25 ± 0.05
SHO-GP 2.61 ± 0.07 7.3 ± 0.6 0.17 ± 0.05 5.01 ± 0.08 12.4 ± 1.3 0.25 ± 0.05

Notes. Carleo et al. (2020) used a sinusoidal function as baseline and the pyaneti code (Barragán et al. 2019). Results employing polynomials as baseline were retrieved using the MCMCI code, while results employing a SHO-GP as baseline were retrieved using the allesfitter code.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.