Table 2.
Best-fit parameters for the 22 long GRBs analyzed in this work.
Name | Best fit model | α1(α) | Ebreak | α2 | Epeak | β | Ecutoff | PG-Stat/DOF | ΔAIC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[keV] | [keV] | [MeV] | |||||||
110721 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥689.6 | 361.1/319 | – |
160625 | 2SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
655.7/352 | 12.5 |
080916 | SBPL |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
≥ 3468.4 | 385.4/322 | – |
170214 | SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
448.6/322 | 22.6 |
100724 | SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
438.9/303 | 167.7 |
140206 | SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
429.8/338 | 69.1 |
131108 | SBPL |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
≥ 825.1 | 471.9/431 | – |
141028 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥488.5 | 346.3/319 | – |
100116 | SBPL |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
≥ 502.2 | 458.3/414 | – |
160821 | 2SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
487.5/319 | 193.2 |
130504 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥86.5 | 587.5/382 | – |
110328 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥128.6 | 360.3/300 | – |
160509 | SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
388.1/322 | 171.1 |
180720 | 2SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
517.8/318 | 42.2 |
151006 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥188.9 | 310.4/305 | – |
160905 | SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
398.1/303 | 20.6 |
150902 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥495.3 | 379.5/320 | – |
090328 | SBPLCUTOFF |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
325.0/301 | 25.8 |
100826 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥327.6 | 523.9/291 | – |
110731 | SBPL |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
≥ 1941.9 | 380.7/320 | – |
160910 | 2SBPL |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
≥202.4 | 422.8/302 | – |
150202 | SBPL |
![]() |
– | – |
![]() |
![]() |
≥ 56.7 | 388.6/302 | – |
Notes. The first column displays the name of the burst, the second column reports the best-fit model, and the following columns report the corresponding best-fit parameters. If the best-fit model is the 2SBPL, the third and fifth columns show the indices α1 and α2 above and below the break energy Ebreak, which is reported in the fourth column. If the best-fit model is the SBPL, the photon index α is reported in the third column. The peak energy Epeak and the high energy slope β are reported for all best-fit models in the fourth and seventh column, respectively. The cutoff energy, both as an estimate or as a lower limit, is reported in the eight column. GRBs showing a significant cutoff in the spectrum have been highlighted in boldface. The PG-Stat and DOF values are given for each GRB in Col. 9, while the corresponding improvement (ΔAIC) of the fit with respect to the basic model (SBPL or 2SBPL) is reported in the last column only for GRBs showing a cutoff.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.