Table 13.
Median and σ for each GGC distance modulus difference (Δ) between Baumgardt & Vasiliev (2021) and this work (see Figs. 15, 17, and 18).
| Cal. LMC |
Phot. par. |
ABL |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nGGCs | Median Δ | σmed | Median Δ | σmed | Median Δ | σmed | |
| (mag) | (mag) | (mag) | (mag) | (mag) | (mag) | ||
| ΔJ | 22 | 0.203 | 0.037 | 0.157 | 0.037 | 0.140 | 0.037 |
| ΔKs | 22 | 0.158 | 0.026 | 0.101 | 0.026 | 0.086 | 0.026 |
| ΔWG | 22 | 0.145 | 0.027 | 0.136 | 0.027 | 0.092 | 0.027 |
| ΔWJKs | 22 | 0.092 | 0.014 | 0.027 | 0.014 | −0.007 | 0.014 |
| ΔWVKs | 12 | 0.108 | 0.019 | 0.059 | 0.019 | 0.043 | 0.019 |
Notes. “#GGC” indicates the number of GGCs used in the calculation. “Cal. LMC” stands for the distance moduli of GGCs obtained through the calibration of PL and PW based on LMC geometric distance, while Phot. par and ABL show the results obtained using the Gaia parallaxes with two different techniques (see text).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.