Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 684, April 2024
Article Number L25
Number of page(s) 5
Section Letters to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449436
Published online 25 April 2024

© The Authors 2024

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

1. Introduction

Classical T Tauri stars (CTTSs) are young, low-mass stars (M ≲ 2 M), the observed activity of which (spectral and photometric variability, line emission, veiling continuum, etc.) is associated with the magnetospheric accretion of protoplanetary disk matter (Bertout et al. 1988; Hartmann et al. 2016). Disk accretion onto CTTSs is accompanied by mass outflow from the disk. Jets and winds play an important role in removing angular momentum from CTTSs and their disks, thus setting the initial conditions for planet formation (Frank et al. 2014). The Balmer H I and forbidden lines (FLs) in the spectra of CTTSs are our main source of information about the kinematics and physical conditions of the outflow.

The profiles of FLs consist of (at least) two components: a low velocity component (LVC), |Vr|≲30 km s−1, and a high velocity component (HVC), which trace spatially and physically distinct regions (Kwan & Tademaru 1988; Hartigan et al. 1995). The LVC of FLs is formed in the wind “blowing” from the surface of the accretion disk due to the photoevaporation of the disk atmosphere, which is heated by UV and X-ray radiation from the central star and/or a magneto-centrifugal mechanism (see, e.g., Weber et al. 2020 and references therein). The FLs of most, if not all, CTTSs have LVCs (Nisini et al. 2018), the majority of which are stable on a timescale of decades (Simon et al. 2016).

The HVCs of FLs originate in the jets, that is, in extended (up to 3 pc) fast (V ∼ 300 km s−1) highly collimated bipolar gas flows (Bally 2016). The jets look like a chain of compact emission nebulae (knots), the so-called Herbig-Haro (HH) objects, with less dense gas between them. The FLs in the spectrum of a star appear to have a HVC if such a knot (micro-jet) falls into the slit of the spectrograph. Otherwise, the jet can be detected in images of the star’s vicinity obtained in a narrowband filter centered at a suitable emission line, such as [S II] 6731 Å or Hα.

There is a general consensus that jet launching and collimating involve the dynamical interaction of the innermost regions of the disk with the global magnetic field of the CTTS (Ferreira et al. 2006; Beskin et al. 2023). In other words, a strong global magnetic field and a high accretion rate are the necessary conditions for the formation of jets from CTTSs. But it is unclear if these conditions are also sufficient. This is a nontrivial question because the frequency of the jet phenomenon among CTTSs is < 40% (Nisini et al. 2018).

BP Tau is of particular interest in this context. This single (Kounkel et al. 2019) CTTS (Kenyon & Hartmann 1995) has a strong global magnetic field (Donati et al. 2008; Flores et al. 2019) and actively accretes matter (Long et al. 2011) from its protoplanetary disk, as discovered by Long et al. (2019). The star is also the source of an outflow observed in emissions from forbidden (Hartigan et al. 1995) and dipole-allowed (Gullbring et al. 1996; Alencar & Basri 2000; Errico et al. 2001) transitions.

The supposed evidence of HVCs in the FLs of BP Tau is controversial. The [S II] 6731 Å line redshifted by ≈120 km s−1 relative to the star was observed by Hartigan et al. (1995) to have equivalent widths (EWs) of 0.10 ± 0.05 and 0.07 ± 0.02 Å on January 5 and 7, 1988, respectively. However, according to Simon et al. (2016), the EW of this line was < 0.005 Å in the spectra observed in 2006 and 2012. The [S II] 6731 Å line is also absent in the high-resolution spectra of BP Tau observed in 2021−2022 by Nisini et al. (2024, see their Fig. A.1), but the authors found weak HVCs in the [O I] 5577, 6300 Å, and [S II] 4068 Å lines, which, in their opinion, indicated the presence of a jet from BP Tau.

Considering all this, the task of detecting a jet from BP Tau is worthwhile.

2. Observations

The observations of BP Tau were carried out with the 2.5 m telescope at the Caucasian Mountain Observatory (CMO) of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute of Lomonosov Moscow State University (SAI MSU; Shatsky et al. 2020). Most of the spectroscopic data were obtained with the Transient Double-beam Spectrograph (TDS; see Potanin et al. 2020 for a description of the instrument and data reduction procedures). The spectral resolution of the TDS is R = λλ ≈ 2400 in the red channel (0.56 − 0.74 μm) and ≈1300 in the blue (0.36 − 0.56 μm). The log of observations is given in Table 1. To obtain the absolute flux for the discovered HH objects, we also performed spectrophotometric observations under suitable conditions with the spectrophotometric standard G191-B2B.

Table 1.

Log of TDS observations.

When we observed BP Tau, the light input unit and the fiber line for the future high-resolution spectrograph of the 2.5 m telescope were undergoing tests with the help of an old SAI spectrograph, RADUGA (its main R2 echelle grating is 75 lines/mm, with a double-pass prism cross-dispersion, a beam of 45 mm, and a spectral range of 4100−8200 Å). The 100 μm fiber output (the equivalent of a 2 . 5 $ 2{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}5 $ diaphragm) was reimaged onto the slit to cut some 50% of the light and push the resolving power up to R ∼ 24 000. We used this occasion to obtain spectra of BP Tau, on January 11, 2024.

Direct 10′×10′ images of the region around BP Tau were obtained with the NBI CCD camera of the 2.5 m telescope in two filters – [S II] 672 nm, with a total exposure of 170 min, and the nearby continuum [S II]rc (115 min) – on December 20, 2023 (JD = 2 460 299.5) and January 4, 2024 (JD = 2 460 314.3)1. To minimize the effects of variable seeing, we changed the [S II] and [S II]rc filters sequentially with individual exposures of 5 − 15 min.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. The micro-jet

The low-resolution TDS spectrum of BP Tau observed on JD = 2 460 298.3504 is shown in Fig. 1. Along with strong emission lines of H I, He I, and Ca II, the FLs [O I] 5577, 6300 Å and [S II] 4068 are clearly seen. The redshifted [S II] 6731 Å emission is barely noticeable, and the [S II] 6716 Å emission is probably blended by the Ca I 6717.7 Å absorption.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

TDS spectrum of BP Tau. The portion of the spectrum in the vicinity of the [S II] 6716, 6731 Å lines is shown on a larger scale. Fλ is the relative flux.

To locate the source of the [S II] emission, we obtained a TDS spectrum with a 10″-wide slit (JD = 2 460 299.377; see Table 1) with an expected position angle (PA) of the jet of 62°, that is, nearly perpendicular to the major axis of the BP Tau ALMA disk image (Long et al. 2019). From the obtained 2D spectrum, we removed the spatial profile of the star reconstructed using the regions outside the emissions (see Fig. 2). In each line we see a knot at a distance of 0 . 8 $ {\approx}0{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}8 $ from the star and at a radial velocity of V r mj = 118 ± 5 $ V_{\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{mj}}=118\pm 5 $ km s−1 in the stellar rest frame. We integrated this 2D spectrum over the wavelength within each line of the doublet, and the corresponding spatial profiles are shown in the right panel of Fig. 2. The formal approximation of these profiles gives distances of 1 . 0 $ 1{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}0 $ and 0 . 7 $ 0{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}7 $ for the centers of [S II] 6716 and 6731 Å, respectively. We believe that this result indicates the presence of a micro- (counter-) jet from the star. To estimate its orientation (PA, θ0) and projected length (l), we obtained spectra of the star at different orientations (θ) of the spectrograph slit.

thumbnail Fig. 2.

TDS spectrum of the micro-jet. Left panel: long-slit TDS spectrum of BP Tau near [S II] lines observed at PA = 62°. The image is centered on the star in spatial and wavelength coordinates. The spatial profile of the stellar spectrum has been removed. Emission knots are shifted to the southwest from the star. The rest wavelengths of the [S II] lines are shown with dashed lines. The measured velocity of +118 km s−1 is marked with solid red lines. Right panel: relative flux distribution in the [S II] 6716 and 6731 Å lines along the slit and the corresponding fits with Gaussian profiles.

If we consider the star and the micro-jet as two point sources, then the projection distance, s, between them along the spectrograph slit is s = lcos[π−(θ0θ)]. The observed dependence, s = s(θ), is shown in Fig. 3 together with the fitting curve derived via the least squares method with σ s 2 $ \sigma_s^{-2} $ as the weight. This fit yielded θ 0 = 59 . ° 5 ± 6 . ° 5 $ \theta_0= 59{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}5 \pm 6{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}5 $, l = 1 . 09 ± 0 . 09 $ l= 1{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}09 \pm 0{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}09 $.

thumbnail Fig. 3.

Observed dependence, s = s(θ), and its fit (red curve). See the main text for details.

We also observed a [O I] 6300 Å line photocenter shift of −9 ± 3 mas at Vr = +115 ± 20 km s−1 relative to the nearby spectrum in our TDS observation with the best signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) – JD = 2 460 299.377, PA = 62°. Unfortunately, we cannot convert it to the projection distance, s, due to the dominating contribution of the wind component in the line profile, so the two-component (star–jet) model cannot be applied. If we assume s = −1″ for the [O I] line, then the amplitude of the micro-jet component at the TDS resolution is 0.01 in continuum units, or about 10% of the wind component. We did not find any spectro-astrometric shift in the blue wing of the [O I] 6300 Å line.

An independent estimate of the micro-jet velocity can be obtained with higher-resolution spectra of BP Tau. The latest available archival2 high-resolution spectrum of the star was observed with the ESO VLT ESPRESSO spectrograph (González Hernández et al. 2018) in December 2022, but the [S II] lines are just barely detected in the spectrum, probably due to ESPRESSO’s small aperture diameter, d = 1″, which does not cover the micro-jet located at a l ∼ 1″ distance from the star. For the same reason, the sulfur lines are not visible in the spectra analyzed by Nisini et al. (2024), who also used a d = 1″ aperture. But in our RADUGA spectrum obtained with a 2 . 5 $ 2{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}5 $ aperture, these lines are present, albeit very weak.

To highlight the difference between the small-aperture ESPRESSO spectrum and our spectrum, we reduced the ESPRESSO resolution to the RADUGA resolution (R ≈ 24 000) and veiled the ESPRESSO spectrum, f = f(λ), by r = 0.3 so that f* = (f + r)/(1 + r), to adjust the depth of the absorption lines3. The two spectra and their difference are plotted in Fig. 4. We fitted the residual profiles of the sulfur lines with two Gaussians, assuming a fixed distance between them, identical widths, and a flux ratio corresponding to the high density limit, F6716/F6731 ≈ 0.43 (Giannini et al. 2015), which is close to the value we found from low-resolution TDS spectra (see, e.g., the right panel of Fig. 2). The final result is that the [S II] lines are redshifted by V r mj = 106 ± 3 $ V_{\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{mj}}=106\pm 3 $ km s−1 relative to the nearby stellar absorption lines. This is in reasonable agreement with the TDS measurement V r mj = 118 ± 5 $ V_{\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{mj}}=118\pm 5 $ km s−1, keeping in mind the distance–velocity interplay due to the wide slit and the uncertainty in the PA of the jet.

thumbnail Fig. 4.

High-resolution spectra of BP Tau. Upper panel: RADUGA spectrum (red) and the corrected ESPRESSO spectrum (black). Lower panel: their difference and the fit for the [S II] lines. See the main text for details.

Considering the above, it is not clear what physical connection exists between the micro-jet and the HVC features of the [S II] 4068, [O I] 5577, and 6300 Å lines, which trace higher critical densities (Nisini et al. 2024).

We next estimated the dynamical time, t dyn mj $ t_{\mathrm{dyn}}^{\mathrm{mj}} $, of the micro-jet and the moment when it was launched. If the projected distance of the micro-jet from the star is l ≈ 1″ ≈ 130 au (Nisini et al. 2024) and the jet tangential velocity relative to BP Tau is V t mj = V r mj tan i 86 $ V_{\mathrm{t}}^{\mathrm{mj}}= V_{\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{mj}} \tan i \approx 86 $ km s−1, where i = 38 . ° 1 ± 0 . ° 5 $ i=38{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}1\pm 0{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}5 $ is the inclination of the disk axis to the line of sight (Long et al. 2019), then t dyn mj = l / V t mj 7.2 $ t_{\mathrm{dyn}}^{\mathrm{mj}}=l/V_{\mathrm{t}}^{\mathrm{mj}} \approx 7.2 $ yr.

Therefore, the micro-jet was launched in the second half of 2016 and moved along the minor axis of the ALMA disk image with a projected velocity of V t 0 . 14 $ V_{\mathrm{t}}\approx 0{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}14 $ yr−1. For a certain period of time, Δt, the counter-jet will be eclipsed by the disk, that is, not visible. We cannot estimate Δt because the radius of the disk region, Rop, which is opaque to radiation at λ ≈ 672 nm, is not known. If Rop is equal to the spatial extent of the semiminor axis, RA, of the ALMA image at λ = 1.3 mm ( 0 . 25 $ 0{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}25 $ according to Long et al. 2019), then Δt ≈ 2 yr. However, it is not clear how different the values of Rop and RA are.

About 3.6 years after the launch, that is, since about the middle of 2020, the jet has reached a distance of more than 0 . 5 $ 0{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}5 $ and thus left the slit of spectrographs with a smaller aperture, for example ESPRESSO or HARPS-N, used by Nisini et al. (2024). We believe this to be the reason for the absence of [S II] lines in the high-resolution spectra observed in 2021−2022.

On the other hand, if R op < 0 . 5 $ R_{\mathrm{op}} < 0{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}5 $, then the lines should have been present in wider-slit spectra in the second half of 2020, and we did find an X-shooter spectrum in the ESO archive observed in August 2021 in which the [S II] 6731 Å line is present; it has the same flux, (6 ± 1)×10−15 erg s−1 cm−2, as in the TDS spectra from December 2023 (see Fig. 5, where we have reduced the resolution of the X-shooter spectrum to that of the TDS one). Both spectra were observed with wide slits, and therefore the micro-jet was completely covered by the apertures.

thumbnail Fig. 5.

Comparison of BP Tau spectra observed in August 2021 (X-shooter, 5″ slit, gray curve) and in December 2023 (TDS, 10″ slit).

3.2. The jet

A part of the 10′×10′ [S II]rc image of the BP Tau vicinity is shown in the upper panel of Fig. 6. The difference between the images of the same region in the [S II] and [S II]rc filters (see Sect. 2) is shown in the bottom panel of the figure. One can see two faint diffuse knots (A and B) located on either side of the star with a S/N per square-arcsecond of ≈5 and ≈2 for knots A and B, respectively. The characteristic size of knot A is ≈5″. The absolute flux of the brightest part of knot A within the circular aperture with a diameter of 5″ is 8 × 10−16 erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1 for the [S II] lines; knot B is about three times fainter in the same aperture.

thumbnail Fig. 6.

Vicinity of BP Tau along the direction of PA = 59° in the continuum band [S II]rc (upper panel) and the difference between images in the [S II] and [S II]rc filters (lower panel). Red markers indicate the location of the HH objects (knots A and B).

The red-channel TDS spectra of these knots (Fig. 7) indicate that the knots are emission nebulae radiating in the Hα, [S II] 6716, and 6731 Å lines. The observed Hα to [S II] flux ratio in the knots is nearly 1.5, which is typical for HH objects (see Dopita & Sutherland 2017 and references therein). These lines are blueshifted for knot A and redshifted for knot B. Equatorial coordinates, the distances from BP Tau, and radial velocities (with the Vr of the star subtracted) are presented in Table 2.

thumbnail Fig. 7.

TDS spectra of the knots (see Table 1; 1 . 5 $ 1{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}5 $ slit). Dashed lines mark the rest positions of the Hα and [S II] lines. They indicate that the emission lines have the same blueshift and redshift (see Table 2).

Table 2.

Parameters of HH objects.

The PA of the line connecting knot B, BP Tau, and knot A is 59 ± 1°, which practically coincides with the PA = 61 ± 1° of the minor axis of the ALMA disk image (Long et al. 2019) and coincides within measurement errors with the micro-jet PA. Furthermore, the BP Tau radial velocity of 16.09 ± 0.16 km s−1 (Nisini et al. 2024) is much lower than that of the knots, which means that the knots move from the star in opposite directions. On these grounds, we believe the knots to be HH objects in the jet (knot A) and counter-jet (knot B) from BP Tau. Professor Bo Reipurth agreed with our arguments; he included the HH flow from BP Tau in his catalog (Reipurth 2000) and named it HH 1181.

One can estimate the mass-loss rate of the micro-jet as follows (Dopita & Sutherland 2017). According to Sect. 3.1, Ne is ≳104 cm−3 in the [S II] line formation region. The typical transverse radius of micro-jets, rmj, is ≳10 au, and the hydrogen ionization degree, xe = Ne/NH, is nearly 0.1 in the [S II] line formation region (Cabrit 2007). Thus,

M ˙ mj π r mj 2 m H N e x e V mj 2 × 10 9 M yr 1 , $$ \begin{aligned} {\dot{M}}_{\rm mj} \approx \pi r_{\rm mj}^2 m_{\rm H} \frac{N_{\rm e}}{x_{\rm e}} V_{\rm mj} \gtrsim 2 \times 10^{-9} \, {M}_\odot \, \mathrm{yr}^{-1}, \end{aligned} $$(1)

where V mj = V r j / cos i 140 $ V_{\mathrm{mj}}=V_{\mathrm{r}}^{\mathrm{j}}/\cos i \approx 140 $ km s−1 is the velocity of the micro-jet relative to the star and mH is the mass of a hydrogen atom. According to Nisini et al. (2024), the accretion rate for BP Tau is ac = 6 × 10−9 M yr−1, that is, its mj/ac ratio is ≈0.3, which is close to the typical value of ∼0.1 (Frank et al. 2014), taking the possible uncertainty of the adopted parameters into account. Unfortunately, we cannot estimate for knots A and B due to a very uncertain upper limit for Ne.

As follows from Fig. 7, the flux ratio, fS, for the [S II] 6716 and 6731 Å lines is close to unity, whereas in the case of the micro-jet, fS is noticeably less than unity. We do not have enough data to determine the physical conditions in the studied objects, but judging by these fS values, the electron number density, Ne, in the HH A and B objects (knots) is noticeably lower than in the micro-jet (see, e.g., Giannini et al. 2015).

As was noted in the Introduction, the [S II] 6731 Å line, redshifted by ≈120 km s−1 relative to the stellar rest frame, was observed in the BP Tau spectrum by Hartigan et al. (1995) in January 1988 (i.e., 36 years ago). It follows from Table 2 that the age of knots A and B is t dyn A 700 $ t_{\mathrm{dyn}}^{\mathrm{A}}\approx 700 $ and t dyn B 145 $ t_{\mathrm{dyn}}^{\mathrm{B}} \approx 145 $ years, respectively. Judging by the dynamical time, t dyn B $ t_{\mathrm{dyn}}^{\mathrm{B}} $, in 1988 knot B was at a distance of ≈19″ from the star, it could not have fallen into the spectrograph slit ( 1 . 25 × 7 . 0 $ 1{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}25 \times 7{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}0 $). It is likely that one more HH object exists in the counter-jet at a current distance of 5−10″ from the star, but we have not detected it in the direct image shown in Fig. 6 (perhaps due to a bright halo around BP Tau) or in the TDS spectra. Additional observations with better angular resolution and sensitivity are needed to test this hypothesis.

4. Conclusion

We have discovered the HH outflow from BP Tau, which was assigned the number HH 1181 in the Reipurth (2000) catalog. Based on our observations, we have come to the following conclusions.

  1. The outflow is highly collimated and consists of two HH objects and a micro- (counter-) jet.

  2. The outflow is directed practically along the rotation axis of the BP Tau protoplanetary disk.

  3. The jet from BP Tau is bipolar, but asymmetric: the number of HH objects as well as their distances and velocities relative to the star are different in oppositely directed parts of the outflow. Most jets from CTTSs are asymmetric, so BP Tau is apparently not an exception. What we see as a jet in fact consists of a string of HH objects; the initial asymmetry possibly originates in the “central engine” and evolves into the asymmetric appearance of HH objects.

  4. There may be one more HH object in the counter-jet of BP Tau at a distance of 5 − 10″ from the star.


3

Dodin & Lamzin (2013) demonstrate that the continuum, rather than the line emission, contributes most to the veiling of BP Tau, so it is reasonable to assume that r is almost constant within the ∼100 Å spectral range in the vicinity of the sulfur lines.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the CMO SAI MSU for the help with observations and Prof. Bo Reipurth for including the discovered HH-flow in the general catalog of objects of this type and assigning it the number HH 1181. We also thank the referee for useful remarks. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database (CDS, Strasbourg, France), Astrophysics Data System (NASA, USA), NIST Atomic Spectra Database (https://www.nist.gov/pml/atomic-spectra-database) and The atomic line list v2.04 (https://linelist.pa.uky.edu/atomic). This work was conducted under the financial support from the Russian Science Foundation (grant 23-12-00092). Scientific equipment used in this study was bought partially through the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University Program of Development.

References

  1. Alencar, S. H. P., & Basri, G. 2000, AJ, 119, 1881 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bally, J. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 491 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertout, C., Basri, G., & Bouvier, J. 1988, ApJ, 330, 350 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beskin, V. S., Krauz, V. I., & Lamzin, S. A. 2023, Phys. Uspekhi, 66, 327 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabrit, S. 2007, in Star-Disk Interaction in Young Stars, eds. J. Bouvier, & I. Appenzeller, 243, 203 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dodin, A. V., & Lamzin, S. A. 2013, Astron. Lett., 39, 389 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donati, J. F., Jardine, M. M., Gregory, S. G., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1234 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dopita, M. A., & Sutherland, R. S. 2017, ApJS, 229, 35 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Errico, L., Lamzin, S. A., & Vittone, A. A. 2001, A&A, 377, 557 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferreira, J., Dougados, C., & Cabrit, S. 2006, A&A, 453, 785 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Flores, C., Connelley, M. S., Reipurth, B., & Boogert, A. 2019, ApJ, 882, 75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frank, A., Ray, T. P., Cabrit, S., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, eds. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 451 [Google Scholar]
  13. Giannini, T., Antoniucci, S., Nisini, B., Bacciotti, F., & Podio, L. 2015, ApJ, 814, 52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. González Hernández, J. I., Pepe, F., Molaro, P., & Santos, N. C. 2018, in Handbook of Exoplanets, eds. H. J. Deeg, & J. A. Belmonte, 157 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gullbring, E., Petrov, P. P., Ilyin, I., et al. 1996, A&A, 314, 835 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartigan, P., Edwards, S., & Ghandour, L. 1995, ApJ, 452, 736 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartmann, L., Herczeg, G., & Calvet, N. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 135 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kounkel, M., Covey, K., Moe, M., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 196 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kwan, J., & Tademaru, E. 1988, ApJ, 332, L41 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Long, M., Romanova, M. M., Kulkarni, A. K., & Donati, J. F. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1061 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Long, F., Herczeg, G. J., Harsono, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 49 [Google Scholar]
  23. Nisini, B., Antoniucci, S., Alcalá, J. M., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A87 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nisini, B., Gangi, M., Giannini, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A116 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Potanin, S. A., Belinski, A. A., Dodin, A. V., et al. 2020, Astron. Lett., 46, 836 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reipurth, B. 2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog: V/104 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shatsky, N., Belinski, A., Dodin, A., et al. 2020, in Ground-Based Astronomy in Russia, 21st Century, eds. I. I. Romanyuk, I. A. Yakunin, A. F. Valeev, & D. O. Kudryavtsev, 127 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Simon, M. N., Pascucci, I., Edwards, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 169 [Google Scholar]
  29. Weber, M. L., Ercolano, B., Picogna, G., Hartmann, L., & Rodenkirch, P. J. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 223 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1.

Log of TDS observations.

Table 2.

Parameters of HH objects.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

TDS spectrum of BP Tau. The portion of the spectrum in the vicinity of the [S II] 6716, 6731 Å lines is shown on a larger scale. Fλ is the relative flux.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

TDS spectrum of the micro-jet. Left panel: long-slit TDS spectrum of BP Tau near [S II] lines observed at PA = 62°. The image is centered on the star in spatial and wavelength coordinates. The spatial profile of the stellar spectrum has been removed. Emission knots are shifted to the southwest from the star. The rest wavelengths of the [S II] lines are shown with dashed lines. The measured velocity of +118 km s−1 is marked with solid red lines. Right panel: relative flux distribution in the [S II] 6716 and 6731 Å lines along the slit and the corresponding fits with Gaussian profiles.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3.

Observed dependence, s = s(θ), and its fit (red curve). See the main text for details.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4.

High-resolution spectra of BP Tau. Upper panel: RADUGA spectrum (red) and the corrected ESPRESSO spectrum (black). Lower panel: their difference and the fit for the [S II] lines. See the main text for details.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5.

Comparison of BP Tau spectra observed in August 2021 (X-shooter, 5″ slit, gray curve) and in December 2023 (TDS, 10″ slit).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6.

Vicinity of BP Tau along the direction of PA = 59° in the continuum band [S II]rc (upper panel) and the difference between images in the [S II] and [S II]rc filters (lower panel). Red markers indicate the location of the HH objects (knots A and B).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7.

TDS spectra of the knots (see Table 1; 1 . 5 $ 1{{\overset{\prime\prime}{.}}}5 $ slit). Dashed lines mark the rest positions of the Hα and [S II] lines. They indicate that the emission lines have the same blueshift and redshift (see Table 2).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.