Open Access

Table 1

Results and comparisons.

Ref. Theory Method C.L. α0 × 103 (1 − γ) × 105 η × 105 ωBD
This work BD (η = 0) INPOP 99.7% ‖1 − γ‖ < 2.50
MCMC 95 % ‖1 − γ‖ < 2.40
66.7% ‖1 − γ‖ < 1.73
This work BD INPOP 99.7 % <3.762 ‖1 − γ‖ < 2.83 η‖ < 2.83 > 35,382
BD MCMC 95 % <3.675 ‖1 − γ‖ < 2.70
66.7% <3.096 ‖1 − γ‖ < 1.92
Bernus et al. (2022) Dilaton INPOP 99.7 % <0.237 <0.0112
Cost function
Bertotti et al. (2003) PPN Cassini SC 1−σ (−2.1 ± 2.3)
66.7 % ‖1 − γ‖ < 4.4
Genova et al. (2018) PPN wo Eq. (15) MSG 1−σ Fixed (−5.48 ± 7.3)
w Eq. (15) 1−σ Fixed (−6.65 ± 7.2)
Viswanathan et al. (2018) PPN LLR 3−σ 0 η‖ < 30
Voisin et al. (2020) BD Pulsars 95% <1.9 <0.76 <0.76 >[1.3−1.4] × 105

Notes. The first column gives the references of the published values where Cols. 2–4 give the theoretical background, the method, and the confidence level used for the publication, respectively. Finally, the last four columns give the obtained values corresponding to the following parameters: α0, (1 − γ), η, and ωBD.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.