Open Access

Table 6.

Impact of measurement errors on the constraints provided by surveys A and B, and eRASS:8.

Case Param. Survey A Survey A Survey B Survey B eRASS:8 eRASS:8
no errors with errors no errors with errors no errors with errors
ΔΩm 0.014 0.015 0.0094 0.0096 0.0025 0.0026
Δσ8 0.0095 0.0097 0.0060 0.0061 0.0013 0.0014
wCDM Δw0 0.077 0.078 0.054 0.055 0.024 0.025

ΔΩm 0.025 0.26 0.016 0.017 0.0039 0.0044
Δσ8 0.015 0.015 0.0091 0.0094 0.0016 0.0018
Δw0 0.32 0.33 0.22 0.23 0.079 0.091
-4wzCDM Δwa 1.25 1.27 0.87 0.89 0.40 0.45

ΔΩm 0.014 0.014 0.0094 0.0095 0.0032 0.0033
Δσ8 0.038 0.038 0.025 0.026 0.0092 0.0095
Primordial non Gaussianities ΔfNL 470 470 310 310 110 110

Notes. Comparison of the impact of measurement errors on the main surveys discussed in this study. All analyses presented here use the full z–CR–HR information, and ten bins in redshift. eRASS:8 is All-Sky. Measurement error models are rescaled according to the depth of each survey.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.