Open Access

Table 3.

Significance of deviation (in units of σ) for the expected line ratios from each strong-line calibration to our JADES sample presented in Figs. 47.

Maiolino et al. (2008) Curti et al. (2017, 2020) Bian et al. (2018)
R2 R3 R23 O3O2 R2 R3 R23 O3O2 R2 R3 R23 O3O2
σcal 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.20 0.11 0.09 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Sample deviation 1.17 1.12 1.04 1.11 1.13 0.95 1.04 1.11 0.50 0.58 0.96

Nakajima et al. (2022) All Nakajima et al. (2022) Large EW Nakajima et al. (2022) Small EW

R2 R3 R23 O3O2 R2 R3 R23 O3O2 R2 R3 R23 O3O2
σcal 0.27 0.16 0.10 0.39 0.21 0.06 0.06 0.25 0.21 0.17 0.08 0.35
Sample deviation 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.13 1.09 0.66 0.74 0.96 1.32 1.67 1.28 1.60

Notes. The metallicity dependency varies across each strong-line diagnostic examined (e.g., the turnover points in R3 and R23), thus we include (12 + log(O/H)Te)−(12 + log(O/H)cal) in Figs. 47 to demonstrate offsets with the respect to 12 + log(O/H)Te for our individual galaxies.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.