Table 2
Performance of interpolation methods and of the proposed ANNs, with and without the removal of outlier from the training set.
Method | Error factor | Memory | Speed | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean | 99th per. | max | (MB) | ms) | |||
No outlier removal | near. neighbor | ×13.1 | ×11.3 | ×3e5 | 1650 | 62 | |
linear | 15.7 | ×2.3 | ×143 | 1650 | 1.5e3 | ||
spline | linear | 15.7 | ×2.3 | ×144 | 1650 | … | |
cubic | 11.2 | ×2.2 | ×122 | 1650 | … | ||
quintic | 19.1 | ×2.9 | ×304 | 1650 | … | ||
RBF | linear | 10.2 | 96.8 | ×99 | 1650 | 1.1e4 | |
cubic | 10.4 | ×2.1 | ×112 | 1650 | 1.1e4 | ||
quintic | 10.9 | ×2.1 | ×118 | 1650 | 1.1e4 | ||
ANN | R | 7.3 | 64.8 | ×81 | 118 | 12 | |
R+P | 6.2 | 49.7 | ×84 | 118 | 13 | ||
Outlier removal on training set | near. neighbor | ×13.1 | ×11.6 | ×3e5 | 1650 | 62 | |
linear | 15.9 | ×2.4 | ×143 | 1650 | 1.5e3 | ||
spline | linear | 15.9 | ×2.4 | ×144 | 1650 | … | |
cubic | 11.1 | ×2.2 | ×120 | 1650 | … | ||
quintic | 20.0 | ×2.7 | ×285 | 1650 | … | ||
RBF | linear | 10.3 | 97.3 | ×97.5 | 1650 | 1.1e4 | |
cubic | 10.5 | ×2.0 | ×106 | 1650 | 1.1e4 | ||
quintic | 10.9 | ×2.0 | ×114 | 1650 | 1.1e4 | ||
ANN | R | 5.1 | 42.0 | ×32.8 | 118 | 12 | |
R+P | 5.5 | 42.3 | ×41 | 118 | 13 | ||
R+P+C | 4.9 | 44.5 | ×44 | 51 | 14 | ||
R+P+D | 4.5 | 33.1 | ×33.8 | 125 | 11 | ||
R+P+C+D | 4.8 | 37.9 | ×37.6 | 43 | 14 |
Notes. Evaluation speeds are measured on the full set of L lines for 1000 random points. The measurements are performed on a personal laptop equipped with eight logical cores running at 3.00 GHz. Error factors are evaluated on the test set. For neural network architectures, C stands for a line clustering and specialist networks, D for a dense architecture, P for a polynomial transform and R for the design of the last hidden layer using PCA. For each criterion, the best obtained values are highlighted in bold.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.