Open Access

Table 1.

Isochronal ages for the 37 stellar groups in Sco-Cen as selected with SigMA in Ratzenböck et al. (2023).

SigMA Traditional Group name Number of sources (a) Age PARSEC Age BHAC15

regions All BPRP GRP BPRP GRP BPRP GRP
(Myr) (Myr) (Myr) (Myr)
1 US ρ Oph/L1688 535 338 350 3.8 (3.4, 4.2) 3.6 (3.3, 4.1) 3.2 (3.1, 3.4) 4.6 (4.4, 4.8)
2 (c) US ν Sco 150 98 101 5.8 (5.3, 7.6) 6.2 (5.7, 7.7) 3.9 (3.4, 4.1) 5.7 (5.4, 6.1)
3 US δ Sco 691 485 505 9.8 (8.4, 11.0) 10.5 (8.6, 11.0) 6.4 (5.8, 7.5) 7.8 (7.4, 8.8)
4 (c) US β Sco 285 200 206 7.6 (6.9, 8.4) 8.1 (7.6, 8.4) 4.8 (4.6, 5.3) 7.0 (6.7, 7.6)
5 US σ Sco 544 381 415 10.0 (9.5, 11.0) 10.5 (9.4, 11.0) 6.0 (5.8, 6.3) 8.9 (8.4, 9.4)
6 US Antares 502 347 357 12.7 (11.0, 13.1) 12.6 (10.3, 12.9) 6.0 (5.8, 6.5) 8.9 (8.5, 9.5)
7 US ρ Sco 240 173 180 13.7 (13.1, 15.0) 13.7 (13.0, 15.0) 7.9 (7.4, 8.3) 11.5 (10.4, 12.4)
8 US Scorpio-Body 373 262 268 14.7 (14.0, 15.5) 14.0 (13.6, 15.5) 9.1 (8.8, 9.5) 13.2 (12.6, 13.8)
9 US US-foreground 276 204 210 19.1 (17.8, 21.5) 18.4 (17.7, 19.4) 12.5 (12.1, 13.1) 17.4 (16.6, 18.2)

10 UCL V1062-Sco 1029 760 778 15.0 (13.6, 15.9) 15.1 (13.1, 15.9) 10.0 (9.8, 10.5) 13.2 (12.4, 13.7)
11 UCL μ Sco 54 43 44 17.2 (14.8, 18.1) 15.3 (14.8, 18.0) 9.6 (9.0, 10.5) 13.6 (12.4, 15.8)
12 UCL Libra-South 71 54 57 20.0 (17.8, 22.5) 19.4 (17.8, 22.7) 12.4 (10.8, 13.3) 18.9 (17.3, 21.8)
13 UCL Lupus 1-4 226 137 138 6.0 (5.1, 6.6) 5.9 (4.8, 6.5) 4.3 (4.1, 5.2) 6.3 (5.7, 7.1)
14 UCL η Lup 769 580 598 15.3 (15.0, 15.9) 14.8 (14.1, 15.5) 9.8 (9.1, 10.1) 14.4 (13.8, 14.7)
15 UCL ϕ Lup 1114 792 825 16.9 (16.3, 17.8) 17.7 (16.4, 17.9) 9.9 (9.4, 10.3) 16.4 (15.9, 17.0)
16 (b) UCL Norma-North 42 32 33 42.1 (33.2, 51.1) 35.3 (29.2, 51.2) 38.8 (29.9, 42.9) 36.0 (28.5, 42.5)
17 UCL e Lup 516 401 413 20.9 (20.1, 21.6) 21.4 (20.8, 22.3) 11.0 (10.7, 11.5) 17.9 (16.4, 20.1)
18 UCL UPK606 131 97 100 13.4 (12.7, 14.8) 13.2 (12.7, 14.7) 8.5 (8.0, 8.9) 12.5 (11.7, 13.2)
19 UCL ρ Lup 246 182 190 14.4 (13.5, 14.8) 14.4 (13.4, 14.8) 9.4 (8.9, 10.2) 13.8 (13.0, 14.1)
20 UCL ν Cen 1737 1265 1335 15.7 (14.8, 16.0) 15.2 (14.9, 16.1) 9.5 (8.8, 12.1) 14.6 (14.3, 15.1)

21 LCC σ Cen 1805 1308 1342 15.5 (15.0, 16.1) 15.5 (15.1, 15.9) 9.5 (8.8, 9.9) 14.7 (14.4, 15.3)
22 LCC Acrux 394 276 283 11.2 (10.2, 12.2) 10.7 (10.1, 11.5) 7.3 (6.9, 7.4) 10.4 (10.1, 10.8)
23 LCC Musca-foreground 95 66 67 10.2 (9.5, 11.2) 10.3 (9.5, 11.8) 6.9 (6.7, 7.4) 10.7 (9.8, 11.7)
24 LCC ϵ Cham 39 23 24 8.8 (8.4, 9.4) 8.8 (8.4, 10.8) 5.4 (5.0, 6.0) 7.9 (7.1, 9.6)
25 LCC η Cham 30 20 21 9.4 (8.5, 10.8) 8.8 (8.6, 10.8) 6.1 (5.5, 6.9) 8.6 (7.4, 10.5)
26 Pipe B59 32 15 15 3.4 (2.5, 6.5) 6.5 (3.2, 6.9) 3.0 (2.1, 3.1) 3.1 (2.6, 4.4)
27 Pipe Pipe-North 42 31 31 15.9 (13.8, 17.5) 16.5 (13.1, 19.9) 10.1 (8.4, 10.8) 13.3 (12.1, 16.7)
28 Pipe θ Oph 98 70 70 15.4 (13.5, 16.2) 14.1 (13.4, 15.9) 9.5 (8.9, 10.5) 15.6 (14.0, 16.3)

29 CrA CrA-Main 96 65 69 8.5 (6.1, 10.5) 9.1 (8.1, 11.3) 6.1 (5.5, 8.5) 8.6 (7.4, 10.6)
30 CrA CrA-North 351 243 271 11.6 (10.8, 12.1) 11.2 (10.8, 11.8) 6.6 (5.8, 6.9) 9.9 (9.2, 10.9)
31 CrA Scorpio-Sting 132 92 94 14.5 (13.9, 15.1) 13.9 (12.6, 14.5) 8.5 (8.1, 9.0) 11.3 (10.6, 12.3)

32 Cham Centaurus-Far 99 66 68 8.5 (7.2, 9.6) 8.0 (7.2, 9.6) 5.9 (5.6, 7.1) 9.0 (8.1, 11.1)
33 Cham Chamaeleon-1 192 107 114 3.8 (2.9, 5.7) 3.5 (2.7, 4.3) 3.0 (2.6, 3.8) 3.8 (3.3, 4.3)
34 Cham Chamaeleon-2 54 24 24 2.8 (1.7, 3.5) 2.1 (1.7, 2.9) 2.8 (2.4, 3.1) 3.1 (2.5, 4.1)

35 NE L134/L183 24 11 11 9.6 (7.4, 11.3) 9.7 (7.2, 13.6) 5.7 (5.1, 6.6) 9.4 (7.9, 11.7)
36 (b) NE Oph-Southeast 61 49 52 9.2 (7.5, 12.5) 8.0 (7.2, 9.2) 9.5 (8.5, 9.7) 9.5 (9.0, 11.3)
37 (b) NE Oph-NorthFar 28 20 22 19.1 (14.5, 25.7) 19.4 (14.9, 24.2) 9.8 (8.5, 14.9) 17.5 (14.1, 21.0)

Notes. The ages are given for the four isochronal fitting results using the PARSEC and BHAC15 models for both the BPRP and GRP CMDs. The lower and upper age limits are given in parenthesis, determined from the 1σ highest density interval from the marginalized posterior PDF. The differently determined ages are compared in Fig. A.3. The clusters are grouped into traditional subregions for orientation, motivated by the original Blaauw borders, as described in Paper I, while these separations should generally not be treated as physically meaningful entities.

(a)

The numbers of sources are as follows: All = the number of all stellar member candidates per SigMA cluster. BPRP = after applying the photometric quality criteria for the BPRP CMD. GRP = after applying the photometric quality criteria for the GRP CMD.

(b)

The three clusters Norma-North, Oph-SE, and Oph-NF are excluded from the analysis of the star formation history in Sco-Cen since they are likely unrelated (see text), hence, they are not included in Fig. 1, which shows the cluster surfaces in 3D of the 34 remaining clusters.

(c)

The majority of the cluster isochrones were fit with zero extinction, except for ν Sco and β Sco, where the best fitting PARSEC isochrones have a visual extinction AV of mag and mag, respectively. The full table is available at the CDS.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.