Table 2
Best-fit parameters of the 4U 1626−67 ObsID 30101029002 pulse and amplitude models compared to spectral results.
| PF | 1st | Spectral | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
1.1/17 | 1.6/13 | – | |
 |
1.4/40 | 1.140 | – | |
 |
4 | 6 | – | |
 |
3 | 5 | – | |
| Esplit | 13.21 | 12.33 | – | keV |
| ACyc | −2.16 ± 0.14 |  |
23.0 ± 0.9 | |
| ECyc | 38.29 ± 0.15 | 39.07 ± 0.19 | 37.90 ± 0.15 | keV |
| σCyc | 3.06 ± 0.20 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | keV |
Notes. The last column gives the values from the spectral best fit of the same data set (see Model BWM3 of Table 1 in D’Aì et al. 2017). 
and 
are the reduced χ2 for the lower- and higher-energy sections, respectively, with 
and 
the corresponding polynomial orders. Esplit is the energy at which we separate the two regions.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.