Open Access

Table 1.

Comparison of the quantities indicating the accuracy of the WSR, OWF, COS, and COV models for 4000 iteration steps in the physical box using the artificial magnetogram.

L/L0 Ld/Ld0 Lf/Lf0 σJ EF/EP ϵ NVE VC CS ⟨ ∣ fi ∣ ⟩
( × 10−3) ( × 10−2) ( × 10−3) ( × 10−1) ( × 10−1) ( × 10−1) ( × 10−1) ( × 10−1) ( × 10−4)
L&L 0.68 0.012 1.462 10 0 10 10 0
nd = 0:
WSR 3.09 1.51 2.53 7.93 1.38 1.402 9.59 2.65 9.91 8.76 1.9
COS 3.19 2.40 2.21 6.43 1.12 1.411 9.65 2.44 9.93 8.87 3.0
COV 3.17 1.53 2.60 7.90 1.37 1.410 9.51 2.77 9.90 8.73 2.21

nd = 8:
OWF 0.36 0.19 0.26 3.28 0.57 1.459 9.93 2.16 9.96 9.17 2.8
COS 0.42 0.32 0.22 3.24 0.57 1.441 9.86 2.18 9.96 9.29 4.4
COV 0.38 0.21 0.26 3.25 0.57 1.445 9.92 1.83 9.96 9.20 3.28

Notes. The lateral and top sides of boundary values for the L & L test case are used from the potential field. Therefore, we do not expect exact agreement between the extrapolation and the semi-analytic solution.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.