Table 3.
Previous measurements of the time delay Δt and the differential magnification ℛq between the NE and SW lensed images.
Observations date | Method | Δt (days) | ℛq | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|
1990–1991 | Light-curve of VLA data at 8.4 and 15 GHz | 44 ± 9 (a) | 1.17 − 1.23 | van Ommen et al. (1995) |
1997–1998 | Light-curve of ATCA 8.6 GHz data |
![]() |
1.52 ± 0.05 | Lovell et al. (1998) |
1996–1998 | Saturation of the HCO+J = 2 − 1 line |
![]() |
– | Wiklind & Combes (2001) |
1997 Jan.–Apr. | 43 GHz VLBI observations (b) | – | 1.13 ± 0.61 | Jin et al. (2003) |
2008–2010 | γ-ray light curve from Fermi-LAT | 27 ± 0.6 (c) | – | Barnacka et al. (2011) |
2012 Apr.–Jun. | Model of a chromatic jet to ALMA data | 27 (d) | 1.35 | Martí-Vidal et al. (2013) |
2008–2015 | γ-ray light curve from Fermi-LAT | 23 ± 0.5, 19.7 ± 1.2 (e) | n.c. (e) | Barnacka et al. (2015) |
2008–2011 | γ-ray light curve from Fermi-LAT | n.a. (e) | > 6 (e) | Abdo et al. (2015) |
2019 Jul. | Lensing model from ALMA observations | 26–29 (f) | 1.07 (d) | Muller et al. (2020a) |
2016 Mar.–Sep. | ALMA monitoring | 25 ± 3 (g) | 1.24 ± 0.04 (g) | This work |
Notes.
From the determinant of the relative magnification matrix between the two vectors formed by the core-jet separation and offset between polarized and total-intensity emission for different epochs;
Disputed by Abdo et al. (2015), as signal in the time-series analysis could come from the Moon’s orbital motion;
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.