Table 1.
Metallicity and absorption in the G band for a sample of GCs and dSphs, obtained by averaging individual values derived by the SOS pipeline for the RR Lyrae stars in these systems.
Name | [Fe/H]C09 | RRLs | [Fe/H]Gaia | St. dev. [Fe/H]Gaia | RRLs | A(G) | St. dev. [A(G)] | A(G) (*) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dex) | (N1) | (dex) | (dex) | (N2) | (mag) | (mag) | (mag) | ||
NGC 1261 | −1.27 | 14 | −1.13 | ±0.49 | 12 | 1.32 | ±1.47 | 0.02 | (1) |
NGC 1851 | −1.18 | 21 | −1.11 | ±0.48 | 18 | 1.27 | ±1.06 | 0.05 | (2) |
NGC 288 | −1.32 | 1 | −1.24 | ±0.33 | 1 | 0.07 | ±0.08 | 0.08 | (3) |
NGC 3201 | −1.59 | 73 | −1.27 | ±0.36 | 77 | 0.73 | ±0.30 | 0.62 | (4) |
NGC 5024 | −2.10 | 25 | −1.66 | ±0.57 | 25 | 0.49 | ±0.69 | 0.05 | (5) |
NGC 5139-OCen | −1.53 | 36 | −1.42 | ±0.63 | 39 | 0.43 | ±0.36 | 0.31 | (6) |
NGC 5272-M3 | −1.50 | 125 | −1.38 | ±0.39 | 105 | 0.89 | ±1.52 | 0.01 | (7) |
NGC 6266-M62 | −1.18 | 105 | −0.73 | ±0.36 | 88 | 2.77 | ±1.81 | 1.23 | (8) |
IC 4499 | −1.53 | 64 | −1.45 | ±0.48 | 58 | 0.66 | ±0.23 | 0.60 | (9) |
NGC 7078-M15 | −2.37 | 44 | −1.95 | ±0.54 | 30 | 0.89 | ±0.83 | 0.26 | (10) |
Sculptor | −1.68 | 289 | −1.64 | ±0.50 | 275 | 0.53 | ±0.63 | 0.05 | (11) |
Draco | −1.93 | 258 | −1.79 | ±0.67 | 216 | 0.54 | ±0.43 | 0.08 | (12) |
Ursa Major I | −2.18 | 5 | −2.38 | ±0.43 | 5 | 1.94 | ±2.00 | 0.02 | (13) |
Ursa Major II | −2.47 | 1 | −2.24 | ±0.45 | 3 | 0.26 | ±0.04 | 0.25 | (14) |
Notes.
A(G)values obtained by transforming the A(V) values in the literature using the following ratio of extinction coefficients A(G)/A(V) = 0.840 from Bono et al. (2019). N1 and N2 are the number of RR Lyrae stars on which the mean [Fe/H]Gaia and A(G) values were computed, with the corresponding standard deviation of the mean in Cols. 5 and 8, respectively.
References. (1) Salinas et al. (2016); (2) Walker (1998); (3) Kaluzny et al. (1997), Arellano Ferro et al. (2013); (4) Layden & Sarajedini (2003), Arellano Ferro et al. (2014); (5) Cuffey (1966), Goranskij (1976), Arellano Ferro et al. (2011); (6) Braga et al. (2018); (7) Benkő et al. (2006); (8) Contreras et al. (2010); (9) Walker & Nemec (1996); (10) Corwin et al. (2008); (11) Martínez-Vázquez et al. (2016);(12) Muraveva et al. (2020); (13) Garofalo et al. (2013); (14) Vivas et al. (2020).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.