Constraints from axisymmetric JAM modeling on the power-law mass model parameters (θ_E, γ, and q_m), internal MST parameter λ_int, external convergence κ_ext, anisotropy profile parameter(s), and the cosmological distances D_Δt and D_d. assuming two anisotropy parametrizations: (i) one single constant β ≡ 1 − (σ_θ/σ_r)² for all light MGE components (orange contours), and (ii) one free (σ_θ/σ_r)_inner ≡ (σ_θ/σ_r) for light MGE components with σ < r_break = θ_eff = 1″​​.91 and another free (σ_θ/σ_r)_outer for light MGE components with σ > r_break (blue contours). The blinded parameters are blinded as p_blinded ≡ p/⟨p⟩−1 so that the distributions only reveal fractional uncertainties. The darker and lighter shaded regions in the 2D plots trace 68% and 95% credible regions, respectively. The mass model parameters Einstein radius θ_E, power-law slope γ, axis ratio q, and position angle PA are additionally constrained through a prior from the imaging data from Suyu et al. (2013). The two anisotropy parametrizations provide equally good fits to the kinematics data. However, the BIC selects the constant-β anisotropy model over the other one with one additional free parameter (ΔBIC value is 3.5).