Open Access

Table 1.

Physical properties of AGNs with dust continuum size measurements.

Name Redshift Rd (RM) Ref. Rd (OI) Ref. RBLR FWHM log λLλ(5100 Å) Ref. log MBH log λEdd
(ld) (ld) (ld) (km s−1) (erg s−1) (M)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)
Mrk 335 0.0258 167.5 ± 6.0 1 185 ± 49 2 14.0 ± 4.0 1707 ± 79 43.8 3 6.90 ± 0.13 −0.29
UGC 545 0.0612 ... ... 707 ± 77 4 37.2 ± 4.7 1131 ± 37 44.5 5 6.97 ± 0.06 0.39
Mrk 590 (a)(b) 0.0264 33.5 ± 4.2 1 ... ... 25.6 ± 5.9 2716 ± 202 43.5 3 7.57 ± 0.12 −1.21
3C 120 0.0330 94.4 ± 5.5 6 379 ± 85 2 26.2 ± 7.7 2472 ± 729 44.0 3 7.49 ± 0.29 −0.64
H0507+164 0.0179 35 ± 11 7 ... ... 3.0 ± 1.2 4062 ± 247 42.6 8 6.99 ± 0.18 −1.57
Akn 120 0.0327 138 ± 18 1 387 ± 77 4 39.5 ± 8.2 6077 ± 147 43.9 3 8.45 ± 0.09 −1.73
MCG+08-11-011 0.0205 72.7 ± 1.6 1 ... ... 15.7 ± 0.5 4139 ± 207 43.3 3 7.72 ± 0.05 −1.54
Mrk 6 (a) 0.0195 ... ... 214 ± 60 9 18.5 ± 2.5 5457 ± 16 43.6 10 8.03 ± 0.06 −1.55
Mrk 79 0.0222 67.7 ± 4.8 1 ... ... 15.6 ± 5.0 4793 ± 145 43.7 3 7.84 ± 0.14 −1.31
PG 0844+349 0.0640 99 ± 11 1 ... ... 32.3 ± 13.6 2694 ± 58 44.2 3 7.66 ± 0.18 −0.59
Mrk 110 0.0353 116.6 ± 6.3 1 ... ... 25.6 ± 8.1 1634 ± 83 43.7 3 7.13 ± 0.14 −0.61
PG 0953+414 0.2341 566 ± 44 1 ... ... 150.1 ± 22.1 3071 ± 27 45.2 3 8.44 ± 0.06 −0.40
NGC 3227 0.0038 14.37 ± 0.70 1 45.0 ± 7.2 4 3.8 ± 0.8 4112 ± 206 42.2 3 7.10 ± 0.10 −2.00
NGC 3516 (a) 0.0088 72.7 ± 4.6 1 ... ... 11.7 ± 1.3 5384 ± 269 42.8 3 7.82 ± 0.06 −2.18
NGC 3783 0.0097 76.3 ± 14.1 11 131 ± 20 2 9.6 ± 0.7 4486 ± 35 43.0 12 7.58 ± 0.03 −1.70
NGC 4051 0.0023 16.30 ± 0.57 1 38.1 ± 6.0 13 2.1 ± 0.8 1076 ± 277 41.9 3 5.68 ± 0.28 −0.92
NGC 4151 (a) 0.0033 46.11 ± 0.44 1 44.1 ± 8.3 (c) 9 6.6 ± 1.0 6371 ± 150 42.1 3 7.72 ± 0.07 −2.77
3C 273 0.1583 409 ± 41 14 675 ± 126 2 146.8 ± 10.2 3314 ± 59 45.9 3 8.50 ± 0.03 0.28
NGC 4593 0.0083 41.82 ± 0.90 1 54.8 ± 8.8 4 4.0 ± 0.8 5142 ± 572 42.6 3 7.31 ± 0.13 −1.84
MCG-6-30-15 0.0078 19.6 ± 4.9 15 ... ... 5.7 ± 1.8 1947 ± 58 41.6 3 6.63 ± 0.14 −2.13
NGC 5548 0.0172 61.21 ± 0.30 1 ... ... 13.9 ± 8.7 7256 ± 2203 43.3 3 8.15 ± 0.38 −2.00
Mrk 817 0.0313 92.6 ± 8.9 1 ... ... 19.9 ± 8.3 5348 ± 536 43.7 3 8.05 ± 0.20 −1.45
PG 1613+658 0.1211 334 ± 40 1 ... ... 40.1 ± 15.1 9074 ± 103 44.8 3 8.81 ± 0.16 −1.19
Z 229-15 0.0279 20.4 ± 5.8 16 ... ... 3.9 ± 0.8 3350 ± 72 42.9 17 6.93 ± 0.09 −1.18
Mrk 509 0.0344 121.3 ± 1.6 1 297 ± 31 2 79.6 ± 5.8 3015 ± 2 44.2 3 8.15 ± 0.03 −1.11
NGC 7469 0.0163 85.29 ± 0.43 1 ... ... 10.8 ± 2.4 4369 ± 6 43.5 3 7.60 ± 0.10 −1.24
NGC 1365 (a) 0.0055 ... ... 38.1 ± 4.8 2 ... 1586 ± 465 41.9 2 (f),18 ... ...
IRAS 03450+0055 0.0315 157.4 ± 5.9 1 ... ... ... 3098 ± 55 43.9 1,19 ... ...
IRAS 09149−6206 (d) 0.0573 ... ... 482 ± 49 2 ... 4281 ± 121 45.0 20,21 8.06 ± 0.25 −0.26
Mrk 1239 0.0199 ... ... 189 ± 30 4 ... 830 ± 10 44.5 22 (f) ... ...
WPVS 48 0.0370 70.8 ± 4.6 23 ... ... ... 1890 ± 60 43.6 24 ... ...
Mrk 744 0.0091 19.9 ± 2.2 1 ... ... ... 5616 ± 129 41.8 1,21 (g) ... ...
HE 1029−1401 0.0858 ... ... 880 ± 133 4 ... 5684 ± 284 44.6 21 ... ...
GQ Com 0.1650 210 ± 40 25 ... ... ... 5036 ± 252 44.6 26 ... ...
Mrk 231 0.0422 ... ... 393 ± 83 13 ... 3130 ± 156 45.0 2 (f),27 ... ...
ESO 323-G77 0.0150 ... ... 100.0 ± 4.8 28 ... 2635 ± 132 43.1 21 ... ...
IRAS 13349+2438 0.1076 ... ... 1096 ± 71 13 ... 1796 ± 90 45.0 29 ... ...
IC 4329A 0.0161 ... ... 178 ± 10 4 ... 6472 ± 324 43.2 21 ... ...
PGC 50427 (e) 0.0235 46.7 ± 2.2 30 ... ... ... 3036 ± 74 43.1 30 7.34 ± 0.04 −1.42
PDS 456 0.1840 ... ... 1599 ± 213 2 ... 3974 ± 764 46.3 31 ... ...
PGC 89171 0.0270 ... ... 303 ± 36 4 ... 2644 ± 132 43.9 21 ... ...
NGC 7603 0.0288 ... ... 332 ± 66 4 ... 6350 ± 318 44.4 21 ... ...

Notes.

(a)

This target is discussed as a changing-look quasar in the literature.

(b)

Mrk 590 is a changing look AGN displaying strong variability over the time of BLR and dust continuum observations (Denney et al. 2014). We do not include it in our statistical analysis.

(c)

The continuum radius of NGC 4151 reported by Kishimoto et al. (2011) is statistically consistent with the recent measurement from Kishimoto et al. (2022). We prefer the early measurements because it is close to the RM measurement.

(d)

The BLR of IRAS 09149−6206 was resolved by GRAVITY and the BH mass is derived by GRAVITY Collaboration (2020a). The λLλ(5100 Å) and FWHM of Hβ are from the BASS catalog (Koss et al. 2017).

(e)

The BH mass of PGC 50427 was measured by RM of the Hα line (Pozo Nuñez et al. 2015). We quote the λLλ(5100 Å) from Probst & Kollatschny (2020) observed close in time to Hα RM. We measure the FWHM of Hβ line from the 6dF spectrum (Jones et al. 2009).

(f)

We converted the bolometric luminosity to λLλ(5100 Å) using Eq. (A.2) of GRAVITY Collaboration (2020b).

(g)

Hβ FWHM is converted from Hα FWHM assuming FWHMHβ/FWHMHα = 1.17 (Greene & Ho 2005).

Column (1): Target name. Column (2): Redshift from NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). Column (3): Dust continuum radius based on RM measurement. Column (4): Reference of Rd (RM). Column (5): Dust continuum radius based on OI measurement. Column (6): Reference of Rd (OI). Column (7): BLR radius based on Hβ time lag. Column (8): Hβ FWHM. Column (9): AGN optical luminosity at 5100 Å. Column (10): References of RBLR, FWHM, and λLλ(5100 Å). Column (11): BH mass derived from RBLR and FWHM from Cols. (7) and (8) assuming the virial factor f = 1. Column (12): Eddington ratio derived from λLλ(5100 Å) and BH mass from Cols. (9) and (11) with the bolometric correction factor 9 (Peterson et al. 2004).

References. (1) Minezaki et al. (2019), (2) GRAVITY Collaboration (2020b), (3) Du & Wang (2019), (4) GRAVITY Collaboration (in prep.), (5) Huang et al. (2019), (6) Ramolla et al. (2018), (7) Mandal et al. (2018), (8) Stalin et al. (2011), (9) Kishimoto et al. (2011), (10) Du et al. (2018), (11) Lira et al. (2011), (12) Bentz et al. (2021), (13) Kishimoto et al. (2009), (14) Sobrino Figaredo et al. (2020), (15) Lira et al. (2015), (16) Mandal et al. (2021a), (17) Barth et al. (2011), (18) Onori et al. (2017), (19) Rashed & Eckart (2015), (20) GRAVITY Collaboration (2020a), (21) Koss et al. (2017), (22) Pan et al. (2021), (23) Pozo Nuñez et al. (2014), (24) Probst & Kollatschny (2020), (25) Sitko et al. (1993), (26) Shangguan et al. (2018), (27) Zheng et al. (2002), (28) Leftley et al. (2021), (29) Dong et al. (2018), (30) Pozo Nuñez et al. (2015), (31) Nardini et al. (2015).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.