Table 1.
Adopted combinations of heating models and shearing motions with their outcomes.
Heating model | Shearing | Condensation | nmax (×1011 cm−3) | Tmin (K) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exponential | E | ![]() |
+ | Y | 3.84 | 7529 |
Mixed | M | cBαρβ | ||||
Magnetic | M0 | cB2 | − | Y | ||
Quasi-magnetic | M1 | cB2.1ρ−0.1 | + | N | ||
− | Y | 2.50 | 8503 | |||
M2 | cB2.2ρ−0.2 | + | N | |||
− | Y | |||||
Mok et al. (2008) | M3 | cB2.5ρ−0.5 | − | Y | ||
Reduced exponential | RE | ![]() |
+ | Y | 3.08 | 9196 |
Reduced mixed | RM1 | f(u)×cB2.1ρ−0.1 | + | Y | 6.37 | 8551 |
Notes. Each model has an abbreviation for further reference. Shearing and anti-shearing motions are denoted by + and −, respectively. For those simulations that were advanced far into the prominence evolution, physical values are considered at t = 6741 s. Both maximum number density and minimum temperature are assumed to be reached in the prominence core.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.