Open Access
Table 3.
Comparison of GLEE and LENSTRONOMY model parameters and derived quantities.
Parameter | GLEE constraints | LENSTRONOMY constraints |
---|---|---|
Power-law ellipsoid model | ||
θE (″) (a) | ||
qm | ||
φm (°) | ||
γ | ||
γext | ||
φext (°) | ||
Composite model | ||
Stellar M/L (M⊙/L⊙) (b) | ||
NFW κ0, h | ||
NFW rs (″) | ||
NFW qm | ||
NFW φm (°) | ||
γext | ||
φext (°) | ||
Predicted time delays from power-law and composite models combined (c) | ||
ΔtAB (d) | ||
ΔtAC (d) | ||
ΔtAD (d) |
Notes. Reported values are medians, with errors corresponding to the 16th and 84th percentiles. Angles are measured east of north.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.