Open Access

Table 3.

Comparison of GLEE and LENSTRONOMY model parameters and derived quantities.

Parameter GLEE constraints LENSTRONOMY constraints
Power-law ellipsoid model

θE (″) (a)
qm
φm (°)
γ
γext
φext (°)

Composite model

Stellar M/L (M/L) (b)
NFW κ0, h
NFW rs (″)
NFW qm
NFW φm (°)
γext
φext (°)

Predicted time delays from power-law and composite models combined (c)

ΔtAB (d)
ΔtAC (d)
ΔtAD (d)

Notes. Reported values are medians, with errors corresponding to the 16th and 84th percentiles. Angles are measured east of north.

(a)

Spherical-equivalent Einstein radius.

(b)

M/L for rest-frame V band. The given uncertainties are statistical uncertainties only. The stellar mass is calculated assuming H0 = 70 km s−1 Mpc−1, Ωm = 0.3, and ΩΛ = 0.7, but changes in the cosmology affect the M/L by a negligible amount.

(c)

Assuming a flat ΛCDM cosmology with H0 = 70 km s−1 Mpc−1, Ωm = 0.3, and ΩΛ = 0.7.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.