Open Access

Table E.1.

Parameters and properties of each fit presented in this work.

Reference Catalog − Band N m b Pearson Mean Scatter CCC CCCGV
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
FUV

Brown et al. (2017)2 V − (Calzetti) 3 457 1.21 −0.28 0.99 0.09 0.10 0.94
G − (Calzetti) 91 533 0.95 −0.06 0.83 0.02 0.30 0.83 0.91
V − (Hao) 3 457 1.05 −0.04 0.99 0.01 0.05 0.99  
G − (Hao) 91 533 0.95 0.02 0.88 −0.02 0.25 0.88 0.94

Davies et al. (2016) V 3 457 0.82 0.0 0.99 0.16 0.07 0.87 0.88
G 91 533 0.67 0.12 0.85 −0.07 0.25 0.82

Salim et al. (2007) V 3 457 1.0 −0.01 1.00 0.02 0.03 0.99  
G 91 533 0.88 0.09 0.87 −0.08 0.24 0.86 0.94

NUV

Davies et al. (2016) V 3 457 0.80 −0.13 0.97 0.29 0.10 0.67 0.79
G 91 533 0.59 0.07 0.80 −0.01 0.29 0.76

Salim et al. (2007) V 3 457 1.0 −0.01 1.00 0.02 0.03 0.99  
G 91 533 0.89 0.09 0.87 −0.08 0.24 0.86 0.93

Rosa-González et al. (2002) V 3 457 1.09 0.08 0.47 −0.11 0.32 0.43 0.78
G 91 533 0.83 0.33 0.86 −0.20 0.25 0.77

u-band

Davies et al. (2016)3 V 3 457 0.86 −0.05 0.99 0.18 0.06 0.85 0.81
G 90 9654 0.83 −0.33 0.89 0.42 0.22 0.62

Hopkins et al. (2003) V 3 457 1.23 −0.26 0.99 0.07 0.08 0.96  
G 91 533 1.06 −0.17 0.99 0.15 0.09 0.94 0.97


Zhou et al. (2017) V 3 457 1.28 −0.28 0.99 0.04 0.10 0.97 0.96
G 91 533 1.12 −0.19 0.99 0.16 0.10 0.93

Moustakas et al. (2006) V 3 457 0.83 −0.13 0.79 0.31 0.21 0.50 0.80
G 91 533 0.82 −0.05 0.93 0.14 0.18 0.87

Davies et al. (2016) V 3 457 0.96 −0.12 0.99 0.17 0.04 0.88
G 91 533 0.83 −0.05 0.99 0.09 0.11 0.94 0.95

8 μm


Brown et al. (2017) V 3 3855 0.91 −0.03 0.96 0.10 0.10 0.91

Pérez-González et al. (2006) V 3 3855 1.03 −0.33 0.96 0.29 0.11 0.71

Young et al. (2014) V 3 3855 1.09 −0.39 0.96 0.30 0.12 0.72

Wu et al. (2005) V 3 3855 1.18 −0.41 0.96 0.24 0.14 0.78

24 μm

Rieke et al. (2009) V 3 3855 1.28 −0.28 0.97 0.004 0.13 0.95 0.96
G 68 9116 1.16 −0.13 0.97 0.07 0.16 0.94

Zhu et al. (2008) V 3 3855 1.06 −0.11 0.97 0.04 0.08 0.97  

G 68 9116 0.98 0.0 0.97 0.01 0.12 0.97 0.98

Relaño et al. (2007) V 3 3855 1.04 −0.20 0.97 0.15 0.08 0.89 0.94
G 68 9116 0.95 −0.09 0.97 0.11 0.12 0.94

Brown et al. (2017) V 3 3855 0.94 −0.10 0.98 0.14 0.08 0.89 0.95
G 68 9116 0.91 −0.01 0.97 0.04 0.12 0.96

LTIR

Kennicutt (1998) V 3 3855 1.22 −0.26 0.98 0.04 0.11 0.95 0.97
G 68 9116 1.08 0.03 0.96 0.04 0.13 0.96

Composite tracers

Kennicutt et al. (2009) V − [O II]+8 μm 3 3855 0.93 −0.04 0.96 0.12 0.09 0.91
V − [O II]+24 μm 3 3855 1.0 0.04 0.98 −0.04 0.06 0.98
G − [O II]+WISE-4 35 9226,7 1.0 −0.01 0.97 0.02 0.10 0.97 0.98
V − [O II]+LTIR 3 3855 0.98 0.0 0.98 0.01 0.07 0.98 0.96
G − [O II]+LTIR 35 9226,7 1.05 0.08 0.92 −0.06 0.18 0.91

Arnouts et al. (2013) V − NUVrKs 3 457 0.89 0.19 0.92 −0.07 0.14 0.89 0.80
G − NUVrKs 19 4388 1.01 −0.21 0.87 0.21 0.15 0.68

Bell et al. (2005) V − NUV+LTIR 3 3855 0.92 0.20 0.99 −0.13 0.04 0.92 0.97
G − NUV+LTIR 68 9116 0.97 0.14 0.98 −0.14 0.09 0.93

Clark et al. (2015) V − FUV+24 μm 3 3855 1.01 0.07 1.0 −0.08 0.03 0.97 0.97
G − FUV+WISE-4 68 9116 1.01 −0.11 0.98 0.12 0.10 0.95

Boquien et al. (2014) V − FUV+24 μm 3 3855 1.01 −0.01 1.00 −0.01 0.03 0.99  
G − FUV+WISE-4 68 9116 1.07 −0.05 0.98 0.02 0.10 0.98 0.99

Spectral lines

Kennicutt (1998) V − Hβ 3 457 1.26 −0.25 0.88 −0.01 0.19 0.87 0.94
G − Hβ 91 533 1.04 −0.08 0.94 0.07 0.19 0.92

Kennicutt (1998) V − [O II] 3 457 1.03 0.12 0.85 −0.11 0.19 0.81 0.91
G − [O II] 48 8457 0.84 0.01 0.86 0.08 0.23 0.84
V − [O II] Reddening 3 457 1.12 −0.11 0.90 0.01 0.17 0.89 0.93
G − [O II] Reddening 48 8457 0.92 −0.10 0.88 0.12 0.22 0.86
V − [O II] Metal 3 1929,10 1.25 −0.27 0.93 0.05 0.17 0.90  
G − [O II] Metal 35 4039,10,11 0.94 −0.07 0.91 0.06 0.20 0.90 0.94

Kennicutt (1998) V − [O III] 3 457 1.20 −0.14 0.65 −0.04 0.31 0.64 0.81
G − [O III] 91 533 0.88 0.07 0.78 −0.17 0.32 0.73
V − [O III] Metal 3 1929,10 1.25 −0.22 0.77 0.05 0.26 0.75  
G − [O III] Metal 35 3969,10,11 1.16 −0.05 0.93 0.04 0.20 0.92 0.91


Villa-Vélez et al. (2021) V − [O III] 3 3829 1.10 0.04 0.79 0.09 0.24 0.76 0.89
G − [O III] 35 4519 0.95 −0.13 0.87 −0.19 0.24 0.80
Rosa-González et al. (2002) V − [O II] 3 457 1.15 0.42 0.44 −0.46 0.35 0.22 0.57
G − [O II] 48 8457 0.83 0.58 0.76 −0.44 0.30 0.48
Gilbank et al. (2010) V − [O II] 3 457 1.42 −0.29 0.80 −0.00 0.26 0.78 0.91
G − [O II] 48 8457 1.16 0.01 0.92 0.01 0.22 0.91

Notes. (1) Reference to the literature, (2) Catalog used (V: VIPERS, G: GSWLC) and bands (for composite and spectral line tracers) used to derive the SFR, (3) Number of galaxies used to perform the fit, (4) and (5) coefficients of the linear fit (y = mx + b)1, (6) Pearson coefficient, (7) Mean, (8) Scatter estimated from calibrations; additional scatter from template bias can be found in Sect. 5.1, (9) Concordance correlation coefficient, and (10) Concordance correlation coefficient for VIPERS+GSWLC. For each band, the preferred calibration for GSWLC and VIPERS is shown in blue, and in magenta for GSWLC+VIPERS.

1

Uncertainties on the coefficient m and b are ∼10−2.

2

Using the Calzetti et al. (2000) and Hao et al. (2011) attenuation recipes.

3

Assuming an old-stellar population decontamination.

4

The decontamination cannot be applied to all GSWLC galaxies.

5

Galaxies whose SED fitting was incorrect in the IR were removed.

6

Galaxies with available LW4.

7

[O II] sample (see Tab. 3).

8

Galaxies at z <  0.1 and with NRKsSFR >  1.9 were excluded (see Sect. 4.1.4).

9

Galaxies for which [O III]λ5007/[O II]λ3727 <  2 (see Sect. 4.2.2).

10

Galaxies for which log(O/H)+12 <  8.4 were excluded (see Sect. 4.2.2).

11

[O II]+[O III] sample (see Tab. 3).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.