Comparison between the main physical properties estimated using hyperz and CIGALE tools. Left: SFR derived using hyperz versus SFR derived using CIGALE. There is a good agreement between both estimations (0.03 dex), although there is a significant scatter (0.32 dex). Right: M_* derived using hyperz versus M_* derived using CIGALE. The scatter is smaller than for the SFR (0.17 dex) but an offset of 0.37 dex is observed. Such an offset arises from the different attenuation laws used between hyperz (Calzetti et al. 2000; Prevot et al. 1984; Bouchet et al. 1985) and CIGALE (Charlot & Fall 2000). The different SFHs and metallicity used may also be possible reasons for the increase in the M_* in CIGALE.