Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243391e]


Table 2

LMC radio and γ-ray data.

Frequency log(ν Hz−1) Energy flux 10−12 erg (cm−2 s−1) Reference Frequency log(ν Hz−1) Energy flux 10−12 erg (cm−2 s−1) Reference
7.294 1.038 ± 0.208 Shain (1959) 9.389 9.555 ± 0.490 Haynes et al. (1991)
7.653 1.349 ± 0.203 Alvarez et al. (1987) 9.677 17. 243 ± 1 .425 Haynes et al. (1991)
7.881 1 .410 ± 0.240 For et al. (2018) 9.677 14.250 ± 1.900 For et al. (2018)
7.924 1 .492 ± 0.254 For et al. (2018) 9.932 23.085 ± 2.993 Haynes et al. (1991)
7.932 3.154 ± 0.342 Mills (1959)
7.964 1 .449 ± 0.246 For et al. (2018) 10-11erg(cm-2 s-1)
7.986 2.748 ± 0.581 Mills (1959)
7.996 1.437 ± 0.245 For et al. (2018) 22.2946 ± 0.1336 0.93 ± 0.31 Tang et al. (2017)
8.029 1.956 ± 0.333 For et al. (2018) 22.5635 ± 0.1353 1.64 ± 0.33 Tang et al. (2017)
8.061 1.872 ± 0.318 For et al. (2018) 22.8325 ± 0.1336 1.91 ± 0.19 Tang et al. (2017)
8.090 2.021 ± 0.344 For et al. (2018) 23.1004 ± 0.1343 2.08 ± 0.13 Tang et al. (2017)
8.114 2.043 ± 0.347 For et al. (2018) 23.3691 ± 0.1344 2.17 ± 0.15 Tang et al. (2017)
8.155 2.379 ± 0.405 For et al. (2018) 23.6376 ± 0.1342 1.57 ± 0.15 Tang et al. (2017)
7.653 1 .349 ± 0.203 Alvarez et al. (1987) 23.9061 ± 0.1343 1 .44 ± 0.17 Tang et al. (2017)
8.176 2.175 ± 0.370 For et al. (2018) 24.1747 ± 0.1342 1.16 ± 0.21 Tang et al. (2017)
8.199 2.134 ± 0.363 For et al. (2018) 24.4432 ± 0.1343 0.52 ± 0.24 Tang et al. (2017)
8.199 2.743 ± 0.774 Mills (1959) 24.7117 ± 0.1342 1.09 ± 0.31 Tang et al. (2017)
8.220 1.999 ± 0.340 For et al. (2018) 24.9801 ± 0.1342 < 0.73 Tang et al. (2017)
8.241 2.324 ± 0.397 For et al. (2018) 25.2486 ± 0.1342 0.63 ± 0.36 Tang et al. (2017)
8.258 2.257 ± 0.384 For et al. (2018) 22.781 ± 0.100 3.524 ± 0.912 Ackermann et al. (2016)
8.276 2.313 ± 0.393 For et al. (2018) 22.985 ± 0.100 3.357 ± 0.349 Ackermann et al. (2016)
8.294 2.186 ± 0.372 For et al. (2018) 23.182 ± 0.100 3.041 ± 0.309 Ackermann et al. (2016)
8.310 2.520 ± 0.429 For et al. (2018) 23.383 ± 0.100 2.958 ± 0.256 Ackermann et al. (2016)
8.326 2.378 ± 0.404 For et al. (2018) 23.587 ± 0.100 2.685 ± 0.232 Ackermann et al. (2016)
8.340 2.261 ± 0.385 For et al. (2018) 23.781 ± 0.100 1.811 ± 0.254 Ackermann et al. (2016)
8.356 2.315 ± 0.394 For et al. (2018) 23.985 ± 0.100 0.859 ± 0.240 Ackermann et al. (2016)
8.611 3.774 ± 0.122 Klein et al. (1989) 24.161 ± 0.100 1.167 ± 0.326 Ackermann et al. (2016)
9.146 5.367 ± 0.420 For et al. (2018) 24.383 ± 0.100 0.980 ± 0.315 Ackermann et al. (2016)
9.146 7.406 ± 0.420 Klein et al. (1989) 24.587 ± 0.100 <0.706 Ackermann et al. (2016)
9.362 9.476 ± 1.150 Mountfort et al. (1987) 25.183 ± 0.504 <1.119 Ackermann et al. (2016)

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.