Open Access

Table 2

Performance of 11 different 3-layer CNNs.

CNN design

Filters Past frames (k & m) Inf. speed (VLT/ELT) Tr. time/episode (VLT) Strehl/reward (VLT 0-mag)
CNN 1 32 10 0.29/0.35 ms 1.4s 95.61/−4101
CNN 2 32 15 0.30/0.37 ms 1.5/7 (ELT) s 95.69/−3340
CNN 3 32 20 0.30/0.40 ms 1.6 s 95.74/−3029
CNN 4 32 25 0.30/0.43 ms 1.8 s 95.75/−2934

CNN 5 64 10 0.30/0.67 ms 2.0s 95.60/−4002
CNN 8 64 15 0.31/0.70 ms 2.2s 95.75/−3253
CNN 7 64 20 0.31/0.74 ms 2.5 s 95.75/−3052
CNN 8 64 25 0.32/0.79 ms 2.5 s 95.76/−2845

CNN 9 128 10 0.36/1.52 ms 3.7 s 95.65/−3656
CNN 10 128 15 0.37/1.58 ms 3.8 s 95.71/−2943
CNN 11 128 20 0.38/1.63 ms 4.7 s 95.76/−2847

Notes. All CNN models were trained from scratch with the same PO4AO parameters (see Table 1) and VLT 0-mag simulation environment (see Sect. 6.1 and Table 1). The Strehl and reward were calculated from the last 1000 steps of the experiment. The inference time was also calculated for VLT and ELT-scale systems, while the training time after each episode was only calculated for the VLT-scale system due to computational limitations. The corresponding integrator performance (dominated by the fitting and temporal error) for the “VLT” simulation was 93.59/−10085 (Strehl/Reward).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.