Fig. 11

Download original image
Comparison of labels between the HOTPAYNE estimates and high-resolution spectroscopic results for our reference stars. For all the dots in black, the spectra are collected from the ESO archive (Table3) and degraded to the LAMOST resolution for stellar label determination with HotPayne. For these stars, the literature labels are adopted from Przybilla et al. (2006, 2010), Nieva & Przybilla (2012), and Haucke et al. (2018). Open squares represent the SPB stars of Gebruers et al. (2021), which have LAMOST observational counterparts. The Gebruers et al. (2021) high-resolution spectroscopic labels of these SPB stars are derived using LTE-based model spectra. The HOTPAYNE estimates show good agreements with the literature values. For stars with Teff > 25 000 K, the LTE-based estimation with HOTPAYNE underestimates the Teff due to NLTE effects. Similarly, the log g for supergiants (log g < 2) are overestimated due to the differences between the LTE and NLTE modeling.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.