Free Access
Table 5
Comparison of the different models.
| Model |  |
 |
Strength of evidence(a) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isothermal | 2111.55 ± 0.29 | – | – |
| T gradient | 2110.72 ± 0.30 | − 0.83 | No evidence |
| dtn | 2114.23 ± 0.39 | 2.68 | Moderate evidence |
| dtncos θ | 2112.46 ± 0.35 | 0.91 | No evidence |
| srot | 2116.00 ± 0.38 | 4.45 | Moderate evidence |
| srotcos θ | 2115.87 ± 0.37 | 4.32 | Moderate evidence |
| ver | 2124.07 ± 0.34 | 12.52 | Strong evidence |
| srot, ver | 2122.86 ± 0.36 | 11.31 | Strong evidence |
| dtn, ver | 2125.17 ± 0.39 | 13.62 | Strong evidence |
| dtncos θ, ver | 2123.82 ± 0.32 | 12.27 | Strong evidence |
Notes. (a) The base model to calculate 
is the isothermal model without added wind patterns. The comparison stems from the Jeffrey scale in Table 3. The model with the highest Bayesian evidence is highlighted in bold.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.