Table 1.
Results of the fits for GRBs best fitted by a 2SBPL.
| Name | αBand | Epeak, Band | βBand | α1,2SBPL | α2,2SBPL | Ebreak, 2SBPL | Epeak,2SBPL | β2SBPL |  |
 |
AICBand | AIC2SBPL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100724(029) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
−1.90+0.05 |
 |
 |
 |
0.99 | 0.92 | 463 | 441 |
| 100918(863) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
< − 1.77 |
 |
 |
 |
0.94 | 0.89 | 221 | 213 |
| 130427(324) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
6.01 | 2.83 | 942 | 812 |
| 131014(215) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
2.17 | 1.35 | 642 | 620 |
| 131028(076) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.26 | 1.14 | 438 | 401 |
| 150510(139) |
 |
 |
< − 3.88 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.07 | 0.97 | 374 | 342 |
| 160509(374) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.01 | 0.95 | 484 | 460 |
| 160625(945) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
4.73 | 1.64 | 1607 | 568 |
| 160821(857) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
2.06 | 1.53 | 932 | 699 |
| 170409(112) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.53 | 1.27 | 700 | 588 |
| 171227(000) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.37 | 0.95 | 320 | 227 |
| 180720(598) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1.87 | 1.49 | 853 | 685 |
Notes. The parameters obtained by fitting a Band function are also shown for comparison. Analyzed GRBs are listed in Col. 1 (in parenthesis, the trigger name according to the Fermi catalog). The parameters concerning the Band function (Cols. 2–4) and the 2SBPL function (Cols. 5–9) are defined in Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively. The reduced χ2 statistics (
) and the AIC for each fit are shown in Cols. 10–13. Both errors and upper limits are calculated at 1σ confidence level. Energies are expressed in keV.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.