Table 3
Comparison of SHINE results based on our parametric model with previously published work.
| Published study | SHINE | Compatible(a) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Mass | S.m.a.(b) | Distribution | SpT | Median | 68% CI(c) | Median | 68% CI | |
| [MJup] | [au] | [%] | [%] | [%] | [%] | ||||
| Vigan et al. (2012) | 3–14 | 5–320 | Uniform | AF(d) | 8.7 | 5.9–18.8 | 6.1 | 3.2–11.3 |  |
| 15–75 | 5–320 | Uniform | AF(d) | 2.8 | 2.0–8.9 | 9.0 | 5.6–14.0 | |
|
| Galicher et al. (2016) | 4–14 | 25–940 | Uniform | BA | 1.9 | 0.5–10.1 | 2.7 | 1.7–4.4 | |
| 4–14 | 25–940 | Power law | BA | 2.1 | 0.5–11.1 | 2.7 | 1.7–4.4 | |
|
| 4–14 | 25–856 | Uniform | FGK | 1.2 | 0.6–6.6 | 0.5 | 0.3–0.9 | |
|
| 4–14 | 25–856 | Power law | FGK | 1.1 | 0.3–6.1 | 0.5 | 0.3–0.9 | |
|
| 1–13 | 10–200 | Uniform | M | <9.2 | 1.6 | 0.5–4.5 | |
||
| 1–13 | 10–200 | Power law | M | <11.9 | 1.6 | 0.5–4.5 | |
||
| Lannier et al. (2016) | 2–14 | 8–400 | Uniform | M | 2.3 | 1.6–8.1 | 2.0 | 0.1-4.5 | |
| Bowler (2016) | 5–13 | 10–100 | Uniform | BA | 7.7 | 1.7–16.7 | 2.2 | 1.2–4.1 |  |
| 5–13 | 10–100 | Uniform | FGK | <6.8 | 0.3 | 0.1–0.8 | |
||
| 5–13 | 10–100 | Uniform | M | <4.2 | 0.8 | 0.3–1.7 | |
||
| Vigan et al. (2017) | 0.5–75 | 20–300 | Uniform | FGK | 2.1 | 1.5–4.5 | 3.5 | 1.9–6.2 | |
| Nielsen et al. (2019) | 2–13 | 3–100 | Uniform | BA | 24 | 14–37 | 8.6 | 4.1–15.9 | |
| 2–13 | 3–100 | Power law | BA | 8.9 | 5.3–13.9 | 8.6 | 4.1–15.9 | |
|
| 2–13 | 3–100 | Uniform | FGK | <6.9 | 0.7 | 0.3–2.9 | |
||
Notes. The “Mass” and “S.m.a.” columns give the ranges of companion masses and semimajor axes, respectively. (a)Compatibility between the results from SHINE and from the previous work. We assumed one asymmetric normal distribution for each measurement, and we tested the null hypothesis that the two measurements are equal with a 5 % risk, as described in Appendix D. A check mark indicates that the null hypothesis is accepted, and a cross mark that it is not. (b)The SHINE analysis is always truncated at 300 au. (c)In contrast to confidence intervals that are expressed at 68% confidence level, all upper limits are expressed at 95% confidence level. (d)In Vigan et al. (2012) the sample included only 4 F-stars, therefore we consider that the results are only marginally biased compared to SHINE BA results.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.