Table A.1.
Recent automated approaches to estimate photo-zs.
Reference | Method (a) | Photometric information | Objects | zs range (b) | Depth [mag] (c) | Survey |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | kNN | ugrizy(d) | Galaxies | 0 < z ≤ 2 | i < 25.3 | mock galaxy for LSST from DESC |
2 | ANN | ugriz(e),E(B − V) | Galaxies | z < 0.4 | rPetro ≤ 17.8 | SDSS-DR12 |
3 | METAPHOr, | ugri GAaP | Galaxies | zs ≤ 1 | r ≤ 21 | SDSS-DR9, |
ANN, | KiDS ESO-DR3, | |||||
template fitting | GAMA-DR2, 2dFGRS | |||||
4 | ANN | ugriz(e) | Galaxies | zs ≤ 0.4 | rPetro ≤ 17.8 | SDSS/BOSS-DR12, GAMA-DR3 |
5 | kNN | UV, ugrizy, YJHK | Galaxies | 0.3 < zs < 3.0 | i < 25 | Mock galaxy catalogues for Euclid, RST, |
and/or CASTOR | ||||||
6 | kNN | UV, ugriz,w1w2w3w4 | QSOs | – | 14.7 < r < 22.6 | SDSS-DR12, 2MASS,WISE |
7 | kNN | grizy | Galaxies | zs > 0.01 | 18.5 < i < 25 | SDSS/BOSS-DR14, DEEP2/3DR4, |
VANDELS-DR2, | ||||||
COSMOS, C3R2, | ||||||
COSMOS2015 | ||||||
8 | Tree based | ugriz, BRI | Galaxies | 0.02 ≤ zs ≤ 0.3 | BAB < 24.1 | SDSS/MGS-DR7, |
DEEP2-DR4 | ||||||
9 | Tree based | ugriz | Galaxies | zs ≤ 0.55 | rPetro < 17.77 | SDSS-DR6, 2dF-SDSSLRG, 2SLAQ, DEEP2 |
10 | Gaussian process | griz, RIZ,YJH | Galaxies | 0 ≤ zs ≤ 2 | RIZ < 25 | SDSS/BOSS |
11 | ensemble of | ugriz | Galaxies | zs < 0.8 | iAB ≲ 22.5 | SDSS/BOSS-DR10 |
ANNs, trees | ||||||
and kNN | ||||||
12 | ANN, | grizy(f), | Galaxies, | zs < 1.5 | i ≲ 23.1 | PS1 3π DR1, |
Monte-Carlo, extrapolation | E(B − V) (g) | QSOs, Stars | SDSS-DR14, DEEP2-DR4, VIPERS PDR-2, WiggleZ, zCOSMOS-DR3, VVDS |
Notes.
magnitudes for PSF, Kron and seeing-matched apertures (FPSFMag, FKronMag and FApMag, respectively), as well as 3.00″, 4.63″ and 7.43″ fixed-radius apertures (FmeanMagR5, FmeanMagR6 and FmeanMagR7);
References. (1) Schmidt et al. (2020); (2) Pasquet et al. (2019); (3) Amaro et al. (2019); (4) Shuntov et al. (2020); (5) Graham et al. (2018); (6) Curran (2020); (7) Nishizawa et al. (2020); (8) Carrasco Kind & Brunner (2013); (9) Gerdes et al. (2010); (10) Almosallam et al. (2016); (11) Sadeh et al. (2019); (12) Beck et al. (2021).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.